Files
platform/todo/fleet/a-way-to-mark-a-commit-this-one-ships-so-a.md
T
pastilhasandClaude Fable 5 6071ded175 todo: one file per item, grouped by theme, with a generated index
TODO.md had reached 1050 lines and 72 open items across 28 sections, read mostly
on a phone. It is now a directory: todo/<theme>/<item>.md, one card per file, with
frontmatter carrying id, status, created date and order, and the prose body copied
across verbatim. TODO.md becomes a generated index (bun run todo:index).

Dates: where an item's prose stated one it is used; otherwise its old section's;
otherwise 2026-08-20, floored at the day before the split rather than invented.
date_source records which.

Shaped for a two-way Kanban board, filed as todo/tooling — a card is a file, id is
the identity, frontmatter is the machine's half and the body is the owner's.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 05:42:39 +00:00

32 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown

---
id: fleet/a-way-to-mark-a-commit-this-one-ships-so-a
title: "A way to mark a commit \"this one ships\", so a release is not just `master`'s tip"
theme: fleet
status: open
created: 2026-08-21
date_source: stated
order: 2
---
**A way to mark a commit "this one ships", so a release is not just `master`'s tip.** Wanted
2026-08-21. **No version numbers** — not now — and **not a tag**: the owner does not want a second
ref to mint and push for something the commit itself could carry. So a **codeword in the commit
message**, and the fleet updater pulls to the newest commit carrying it rather than to whatever
`master` points at.
That distinction is the whole value: today a server updates to the tip, so an in-progress commit
ships the moment it is pushed. A marker makes shipping a deliberate act while leaving the push
unchanged.
Shape to settle when it is built:
- **A trailer, not a word in prose** — `Release: yes` on its own line, in the same family as
`Co-Authored-By`. `git log --grep='^Release:' --format=%H -1` then gives the target SHA in one
command, and no commit message that merely *talks* about a release matches by accident.
- **The trade against a tag, stated honestly:** a tag can be moved or deleted when a release turns
out to be bad; a commit message cannot be edited once pushed. Un-marking means marking a newer
commit — which is a forward-only, revert-shaped workflow. That is a fine answer, but it should
be a chosen one.
- The updater then does a checkout at that SHA, not a `pull` — same discipline the plugin-pinning
item asks for: **verify `rev-parse HEAD` matches, or refuse.**