pastilhasandClaude Opus 5
eda004a46d
Reversing my own call from an hour ago. I built the denied-route screen to EXPLAIN the absence — "Music is not installed", with a link to the app store — and argued a redirect erases what you asked for. The owner's correction is the better principle: a server should not know about a sidecar it does not have. Explaining Music is the app describing a feature that, as far as this install is concerned, does not exist, and it leaks the whole catalogue of what could be installed to any member who types a URL. So a denied path is now indistinguishable from an unknown one: redirect home, the same answer App.tsx's path="*" already gave. One behaviour for a member without a grant, an owner without the sidecar, and a typo. Nothing disclosed. The Permissions screen loses both explanatory blocks for the same reason. One listed every capability whose sidecar is absent — a catalogue of uninstallable features presented as a permissions decision. The other described chat, tasks, the desktop and the wallet as "not grantable" to an owner who may have none of them installed. `notInstalled` is gone from the API too, not just hidden in the UI. What is on that screen is what this server can actually do. Still short of what the owner described, and worth naming rather than implying otherwise: routes are DECLARED in App.tsx for every screen and this hides the ones that should not resolve. The end state is routes REGISTERED from the manifests of installed sidecars, so an uninstalled feature has no route to hide. The manifests already exist and the dock is already built from them; the router is not, yet. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>