pastilhasandClaude Opus 5
e9d0261e87
docs/agent-coordination.md states the objective — several agents on one body of work, coordinating with each other rather than through the human — and was written in theory on 2026-08-07. On 2026-08-11/12 it ran for ten hours with two agents and the owner arbitrating. This is what happened, written as evidence rather than proposal. The load-bearing observation is narrower than "two reviewers are better than one": the person who writes the sentence explaining why something is safe is the worst-placed person to notice the code disagrees with it. One agent wrote "a wrong answer here must not happen by accident" and shipped that accident in the same commit; the other wrote a verification script that could not fail on the first one's machine. Neither was careless. Each was reading their own reasoning back and finding that it agreed with itself. Also records what only running found — an installer piped into the wrong shell, a parent directory created root:root, an ACL mask clamped so the file browser could not read a member's home, a chat cwd the member could not enter, ACL entries surviving a chown — all on first executions, all invisible to review. And what the communications channel got right and the five ways its termination rules broke, and why the repo watcher belongs in a shell loop rather than in the model. Names the identity gap as the first thing to build: both agents commit as the owner, so neither the log nor an agent can say who wrote a line. docs/agent-git-identity.md has called that an idea since 2026-08-10; it stopped being one tonight. Also corrects the deprovision spec's status, which still said "not yet run against a real account" after it had been run and verified clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>