pastilhasandClaude Opus 5
cb3e7062b9
The link was made as part of install_bun, so a machine that already had bun never got one. That is this machine: bun 1.3.14 in ~/.bun/bin, no /usr/local/bin/bun, and `bun` resolving to nothing at all for root. Nothing has broken yet only because `pm2 startup` has never been run here — the moment boot persistence is enabled, all twenty ecosystem apps that say `script: 'bun'` fail at boot and work perfectly when started by hand. ensure_bun_symlink now runs whether or not this script did the install, and says which of the three things happened: made it, found it already correct, or could not find bun to link. The last records an error, since a missing link is a reboot-shaped failure rather than a cosmetic one. Safe across upgrades, which was the question: a symlink resolves by path, not by inode, and `bun upgrade` replaces the file at $BUN_INSTALL/bin/bun rather than moving it. Demonstrated by replacing a target with a new file — new inode, link still resolves. It breaks only if the home directory goes, which breaks bun anyway. Also fixed the status line, which reported "not installed" on a machine with bun in the user's home: it asked root's PATH, which is exactly what has no bun before the link exists. bun_version now asks whichever copy is there. This run created the link on this machine — /usr/local/bin/bun -> the account's copy, and root can now run bun. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>