pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 a6e7f64ef2 todo: a commander should suggest the cheapest model for each half of itself
Wanted 2026-08-22, for later. Before arming anything, a commander weighs how hard the job actually is and
proposes which model each half should run on.

TWO models, which is what makes it more than a generic "use something cheaper" note. A commander's own turns
are conversation plus one piece of bash; the agent its loop spawns does the real work and its difficulty is
set by the job. The deploy commander is the worked example — its own turns were unremarkable on Sonnet while
the spawned agent judged six hosts, parsed a plan, decided what to skip and wrote an honest report.

Suggested, never imposed: the failure mode of choosing too small is not a slower answer, it is a watcher
firing on the wrong condition or an agent half-finishing a deploy.

Recorded with the reason it is not urgent: nothing measures whether the choice was right. A spawned agent's
cost is not captured at all yet — the column exists and is always null — so a commander suggesting Haiku has
no way to learn it was wrong. This wants the cost work first, or at least the knowledge that until then it is
a judgement with no feedback loop.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 20:39:26 +00:00
2026-08-22 16:20:11 +00:00
2026-02-16 19:34:35 +00:00
2026-02-16 19:34:35 +00:00
2026-02-16 19:34:35 +00:00
2026-02-22 03:35:26 +00:00
2026-02-16 19:34:35 +00:00
2026-02-16 19:34:35 +00:00

The documentation, triaged

2026-08-13. A map of what is in here, what it is for, and what should happen to it. Made because there are 42 documents and 13,000 lines, and no way to tell from the filenames which describe the system as it is and which are a record of an afternoon in July.

How much I verified: the classifications below are from filenames, status lines, and greps for things that changed on 2026-08-13. Where I actually read the document or checked the code, it says so. The rest is a starting point for a conversation, not a verdict.


Living — these describe the system and must stay true

doc state
working-on-officer.md updated 2026-08-13. Operational guide.
secret-store.md updated 2026-08-13. Built; rotation still open.
install-variants.md new. The branch tree, for discussion.
http-secure-context-audit.md new. What breaks over plain http.
install-container-testing.md new. First container pass and its findings.
per-user-linux-accounts.md partly updated. OFFICER_OS_USERS is gone; check the rest.
navigation-audit.md authoritative on routing. Unverified against tonight's route removals.
workspace-panels.md + workspace-panel-todo.md the panel framework. 1,300 lines combined — likely the biggest cleanup here.
agent-coordination.md the north star for panel work.
deprovision-os-account.md implemented; the 'disabled' stage it may mention was deleted tonight.

Stale — describe things that changed on 2026-08-13

Each of these references something that no longer exists. Not yet corrected.

  • sidecar-topology.md — "ecosystem.config.cjs is the source of truth". It is generated now, and holds six processes.
  • sidecar-app-store.md — derives the catalogue from full − light. Those files are gone, and catalogue.test.ts was rewritten.
  • sidecar-bootstrapping.md — "20 PM2 entries, 18 sidecar dirs". Six entries now.
  • mobile-api-keys.md — partly corrected; recheck the origin-checking claims.
  • wallet-key-custody.md — VAULT_STORE_KEY is now the per-purpose wallet key.
  • push-notifications.md — "agreed design, 2026-07-31". Notify is a plugin and unmounted.
  • chat-session-lifetime.md, chat-ui-walkthrough.md — reference officer-agent, renamed.

Historical — a record of a moment, and should stay one

Do not rewrite these to match today's code. They document how a decision was reached, and editing them destroys the reasoning. If they mislead, add a dated header pointing forward.

  • sidecar-audit-2026-07.md (1,377 lines)
  • claude-sidecar-isolation.md — records the officer-claude → officer-agent rename that preceded tonight's officer-agent → officer-claude-code
  • open-threads-after-per-user-claude.md
  • two-agent-field-report-2026-08-12.md
  • api-method-changes-2026-08-06.md

The opencode cluster — nine documents for one migration

opencode-fork-decision · -parity · -api-2-assessment · -phase0-review · -phase1-report · -phase1-review · -serve-migration-plan · -serve-path · -testing-checklist

The migration landed — opencode serve is in the sidecar, verified. So opencode-serve-migration-plan.md saying "Nothing here is implemented" is false.

This is the clearest consolidation candidate in the whole directory: one document recording what was decided and what shipped, replacing nine that describe stages of getting there. I did not do it because it needs reading all nine, and deleting documents unread is not a thing to do at 4am.

The mobile-dav thread — three documents, one conversation

mobile-dav-provisioning · -feedback · -reply. A correspondence. Almost certainly one document.

Unclassified — I have not looked

design-language-interface · file-sync · jobs-unification · mobile-photo-sync-api · nextcloud-replacement · agent-git-identity


The plugin split, which affects most of the above

A core install is six processes. Everything else is a plugin, switched off tonight but present on disk. Most documents here were written when the estate was twenty processes and every one of them was simply "there", so they describe availability that no longer holds.

The useful rewrite is usually one line, not a rewrite: say whether the thing described is core or a plugin, and if a plugin, that it is not mounted on a fresh install.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme
51 MiB
Languages
TypeScript 84.6%
CSS 6.7%
Shell 5%
JavaScript 3.7%