caldav is not only /api/caldav. four of its surfaces are top-level and above the account gate on purpose, because DAVx5, iOS and Thunderbird send HTTP Basic on every request and have nowhere to put a JWT: /dav, the ios profile under it, and the two .well-known discovery paths a client probes before it has any credential. the mechanism for that already existed — unauthenticatedRootPaths, exclusive claims, first come wins. what stopped caldav using it was RESERVED_ROOT, and what that list was recording is worth being exact about: `dav` and `.well-known` are in it because the PLATFORM serves them today, not because they are dangerous in themselves. once caldav is a plugin, the thing the reservation protects IS the plugin, and keeping it would mean the platform permanently owning routes for a feature it no longer contains. so a reserved name is claimable by a first-party plugin and refused to everyone else. the owner drew that line today: fine for a plugin we wrote, and letting a stranger's plugin claim /dav is a question that needs thinking about properly rather than falling out of a flag. /api stays refused to us too — everything of officer's lives under it and protocolHeaders is the only sanctioned way in. .well-known needed two segments, which the single-segment rule refuses. allowed by NAME rather than by pattern, and the reason is in the same namespace: acme-challenge is how this machine gets its TLS certificates, so a plugin owning it could take the domain. caldav and carddav are on the list; nothing else is, for us as much as for anyone. the OPTIONS carve-out moved with it. hono's cors() answers every OPTIONS as a preflight and never calls the route beneath — which to a DAV client is not a preflight but the question "what can you do", answered by a header iOS refuses the account without. that was a literal list of four DAV paths; it asks the claim registry now, so it follows whoever owns the route rather than naming it here. verified: server boots (totality passes), /.well-known/caldav still 301s and /dav/ still asks for basic auth. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
216 lines
9.2 KiB
TypeScript
216 lines
9.2 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, test, afterEach } from 'bun:test';
|
||
import {
|
||
isPluginPublicPath,
|
||
pluginForProtocolHeaders,
|
||
pluginForRootPath,
|
||
resolvePluginPublicPaths,
|
||
resolvePluginRootPaths,
|
||
setPluginProtocolHeaders,
|
||
setPluginPublicPaths,
|
||
setPluginRootClaims,
|
||
} from './public-paths';
|
||
import type { DiscoveredPlugin } from './manifest';
|
||
|
||
// This is an auth boundary: everything matched here skips `userMiddleware` AND the permission gate. The
|
||
// property worth pinning is not "the happy path works" but "a plugin cannot name a path outside its own
|
||
// mount", because that is the only failure that would matter.
|
||
|
||
const plugin = (appName: string, unauthenticatedPaths?: string[], publisher = 'officerdev'): DiscoveredPlugin =>
|
||
({
|
||
appName,
|
||
dir: `/tmp/${appName}`,
|
||
manifest: {
|
||
publisher,
|
||
version: '1.0.0',
|
||
platform: '>=1.0.0',
|
||
label: appName,
|
||
summary: '',
|
||
color: '#000',
|
||
permissions: [],
|
||
...(unauthenticatedPaths ? { unauthenticatedPaths } : {}),
|
||
},
|
||
icon: null,
|
||
splash: null,
|
||
api: null,
|
||
schema: null,
|
||
sidecar: null,
|
||
web: null,
|
||
}) as DiscoveredPlugin;
|
||
|
||
afterEach(() => {
|
||
setPluginPublicPaths([]);
|
||
setPluginRootClaims([]);
|
||
setPluginProtocolHeaders([]);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
describe('resolving a plugin’s declared paths', () => {
|
||
test('resolves against the plugin’s own mount', () => {
|
||
expect(resolvePluginPublicPaths(plugin('vault', ['/bw/*'])).paths).toEqual(['/api/vault/bw/*']);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('a third-party plugin resolves under its publisher, never at the root', () => {
|
||
const { paths } = resolvePluginPublicPaths(plugin('vault', ['/bw/*'], 'alice'));
|
||
expect(paths).toEqual(['/api/p/alice/vault/bw/*']);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('declaring nothing is the ordinary case and yields nothing', () => {
|
||
expect(resolvePluginPublicPaths(plugin('kiosk')).paths).toEqual([]);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// The rules `publicPathProblem` enforces, checked through this function because that is how they are
|
||
// actually reached. Each is refused rather than corrected.
|
||
test.each([
|
||
['..', ['/../../auth']],
|
||
['a double slash', ['//auth']],
|
||
['a mid-path wildcard', ['/a/*/b']],
|
||
['a bare wildcard suffix', ['/a*']],
|
||
['the whole plugin', ['/*']],
|
||
['the plugin root', ['/']],
|
||
['a relative path', ['bw/*']],
|
||
['a query string', ['/bw?x=1']],
|
||
])('refuses %s', (_label, declared) => {
|
||
const { paths, refused } = resolvePluginPublicPaths(plugin('vault', declared));
|
||
expect(paths).toEqual([]);
|
||
expect(refused).toHaveLength(1);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('one bad entry does not take the good ones with it', () => {
|
||
const { paths, refused } = resolvePluginPublicPaths(plugin('vault', ['/bw/*', '/../nope']));
|
||
expect(paths).toEqual(['/api/vault/bw/*']);
|
||
expect(refused).toHaveLength(1);
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
describe('matching a request path', () => {
|
||
test('a trailing /* matches the prefix and everything under it', () => {
|
||
setPluginPublicPaths([{ pattern: '/api/vault/bw/*', appName: 'vault' }]);
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/vault/bw')).toBe(true);
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/vault/bw/identity/connect/token')).toBe(true);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('it does not leak to the plugin’s own gated routes', () => {
|
||
setPluginPublicPaths([{ pattern: '/api/vault/bw/*', appName: 'vault' }]);
|
||
// The whole point: /config stays behind the session, one segment away from a public prefix.
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/vault/config')).toBe(false);
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/vault')).toBe(false);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('a prefix match is on segments, not characters', () => {
|
||
setPluginPublicPaths([{ pattern: '/api/vault/bw/*', appName: 'vault' }]);
|
||
// `/bwx` shares the string prefix and must not match — the same class of bug `permissionForApiPath`
|
||
// guards against with `/user` vs `/username`.
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/vault/bwx')).toBe(false);
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/vault/bwevil/x')).toBe(false);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('an exact pattern matches only itself', () => {
|
||
setPluginPublicPaths([{ pattern: '/api/kiosk/manifest', appName: 'kiosk' }]);
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/kiosk/manifest')).toBe(true);
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/kiosk/manifest/extra')).toBe(false);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('nothing is public when nothing is declared — the default for every plugin today', () => {
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/vault/bw/identity')).toBe(false);
|
||
expect(isPluginPublicPath('/api/users')).toBe(false);
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
describe('top-level claims', () => {
|
||
const withRoots = (appName: string, roots: string[]) => {
|
||
const p = plugin(appName);
|
||
(p.manifest as { unauthenticatedRootPaths?: string[] }).unauthenticatedRootPaths = roots;
|
||
return p;
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
test('a single lowercase segment is claimed', () => {
|
||
const { segments, refused } = resolvePluginRootPaths(withRoots('vault', ['/identity', '/icons']), new Set());
|
||
expect(segments).toEqual(['identity', 'icons']);
|
||
expect(refused).toEqual([]);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
const thirdParty = (appName: string, roots: string[]) => {
|
||
const p = plugin(appName, undefined, 'someone-else');
|
||
(p.manifest as { unauthenticatedRootPaths?: string[] }).unauthenticatedRootPaths = roots;
|
||
return p;
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
// `/api` is refused to EVERYONE, first-party included. It is where all of Officer lives, and
|
||
// `protocolHeaders` is the only sanctioned way to touch it.
|
||
test('refuses /api even to a first-party plugin', () => {
|
||
const { segments, refused } = resolvePluginRootPaths(withRoots('ours', ['/api']), new Set());
|
||
expect(segments).toEqual([]);
|
||
expect(refused).toHaveLength(1);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// The rest of the reserved list records what the PLATFORM serves today, which is a different claim from
|
||
// "dangerous". A first-party plugin may take one back — caldav owning `/dav` is the whole reason — and a
|
||
// third-party plugin may not. The owner drew that line on 2026-08-27: fine for a plugin we wrote,
|
||
// and a stranger's plugin claiming `/dav` is a question to think about properly rather than a flag.
|
||
test.each([['/auth'], ['/plugins'], ['/dav'], ['/assets']])(
|
||
'refuses the reserved segment %s to a THIRD-PARTY plugin',
|
||
(root) => {
|
||
const { segments, refused } = resolvePluginRootPaths(thirdParty('stranger', [root]), new Set());
|
||
expect(segments).toEqual([]);
|
||
expect(refused).toHaveLength(1);
|
||
},
|
||
);
|
||
|
||
test('lets a FIRST-PARTY plugin claim a reserved segment — caldav taking /dav', () => {
|
||
const { segments, refused } = resolvePluginRootPaths(withRoots('caldav', ['/dav']), new Set());
|
||
expect(segments).toEqual(['dav']);
|
||
expect(refused).toEqual([]);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// RFC 6764's discovery paths: a client is given a bare domain and probes these before it has any
|
||
// credential. Two segments, which the single-segment rule refuses — allowed by name, and by name only.
|
||
test('lets a first-party plugin claim an allow-listed .well-known name', () => {
|
||
const { segments, refused } = resolvePluginRootPaths(
|
||
withRoots('caldav', ['/.well-known/caldav', '/.well-known/carddav']),
|
||
new Set(),
|
||
);
|
||
expect(segments).toEqual(['.well-known/caldav', '.well-known/carddav']);
|
||
expect(refused).toEqual([]);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
// The one that matters most in that namespace: acme-challenge is how this machine gets its TLS
|
||
// certificates, and a plugin owning it could take the domain. Not an allow-list entry, so refused —
|
||
// to us as much as to anyone.
|
||
test('refuses a .well-known name that is not allow-listed, first-party or not', () => {
|
||
expect(resolvePluginRootPaths(withRoots('ours', ['/.well-known/acme-challenge']), new Set()).segments).toEqual([]);
|
||
expect(resolvePluginRootPaths(thirdParty('stranger', ['/.well-known/caldav']), new Set()).segments).toEqual([]);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test.each([['/a/b'], ['identity'], ['/Identity'], ['/']])('refuses the malformed segment %s', (root) => {
|
||
expect(resolvePluginRootPaths(withRoots('evil', [root]), new Set()).segments).toEqual([]);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('two plugins cannot both claim one segment — first come, loser named', () => {
|
||
const taken = new Set<string>();
|
||
expect(resolvePluginRootPaths(withRoots('vault', ['/identity']), taken).segments).toEqual(['identity']);
|
||
const second = resolvePluginRootPaths(withRoots('other', ['/identity']), taken);
|
||
expect(second.segments).toEqual([]);
|
||
expect(second.refused[0]).toContain('already claimed');
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('matching a claimed root is by segment, not string prefix', () => {
|
||
setPluginRootClaims([{ segment: 'identity', appName: 'vault' }]);
|
||
expect(pluginForRootPath('/identity')).toBe('vault');
|
||
expect(pluginForRootPath('/identity/connect/token')).toBe('vault');
|
||
expect(pluginForRootPath('/identityx')).toBeNull();
|
||
expect(pluginForRootPath('/other')).toBeNull();
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('a protocol header hands /api over, and its absence does not', () => {
|
||
setPluginProtocolHeaders([{ header: 'bitwarden-client-name', appName: 'vault' }]);
|
||
expect(pluginForProtocolHeaders(new Headers({ 'bitwarden-client-name': 'browser' }))).toBe('vault');
|
||
expect(pluginForProtocolHeaders(new Headers({ authorization: 'Bearer x' }))).toBeNull();
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
test('nothing is claimed by default', () => {
|
||
setPluginRootClaims([]);
|
||
setPluginProtocolHeaders([]);
|
||
expect(pluginForRootPath('/identity')).toBeNull();
|
||
expect(pluginForProtocolHeaders(new Headers({ 'bitwarden-client-name': 'browser' }))).toBeNull();
|
||
});
|
||
});
|