caldav is not only /api/caldav. four of its surfaces are top-level and above the
account gate on purpose, because DAVx5, iOS and Thunderbird send HTTP Basic on
every request and have nowhere to put a JWT: /dav, the ios profile under it, and
the two .well-known discovery paths a client probes before it has any credential.
the mechanism for that already existed — unauthenticatedRootPaths, exclusive
claims, first come wins. what stopped caldav using it was RESERVED_ROOT, and
what that list was recording is worth being exact about: `dav` and `.well-known`
are in it because the PLATFORM serves them today, not because they are dangerous
in themselves. once caldav is a plugin, the thing the reservation protects IS
the plugin, and keeping it would mean the platform permanently owning routes for
a feature it no longer contains.
so a reserved name is claimable by a first-party plugin and refused to everyone
else. the owner drew that line today: fine for a plugin we wrote, and letting a
stranger's plugin claim /dav is a question that needs thinking about properly
rather than falling out of a flag. /api stays refused to us too — everything of
officer's lives under it and protocolHeaders is the only sanctioned way in.
.well-known needed two segments, which the single-segment rule refuses. allowed
by NAME rather than by pattern, and the reason is in the same namespace:
acme-challenge is how this machine gets its TLS certificates, so a plugin owning
it could take the domain. caldav and carddav are on the list; nothing else is,
for us as much as for anyone.
the OPTIONS carve-out moved with it. hono's cors() answers every OPTIONS as a
preflight and never calls the route beneath — which to a DAV client is not a
preflight but the question "what can you do", answered by a header iOS refuses
the account without. that was a literal list of four DAV paths; it asks the claim
registry now, so it follows whoever owns the route rather than naming it here.
verified: server boots (totality passes), /.well-known/caldav still 301s and
/dav/ still asks for basic auth.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
assets/splash.png is discovered by presence, published by the same copy that
already took the whole assets directory, and carried on DiscoveredPlugin beside
icon.
The platform draws no splash — a plugin has no launch. It is carried because the
plugin repository is where a product's artwork lives now, and the phone app that
fronts the same product needs somewhere to read it from that is not a designer's
folder. The pair is the point: the icon is a reduction of the splash's world,
and keeping them together is what stops them drifting.
Publishing no longer gates on the icon alone, which left a plugin shipping only
a splash serving nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Restores the setup the vault extraction regressed: paste the bare Officer URL
into a Bitwarden client and log in. Nothing else.
The extraction moved the Bitwarden door to /api/vault/bw, which is correct and
unusable — a client derives /api, /identity, /icons and /notifications from ONE
url it is given, so a prefixed base turns setup into five fields copied by hand
into an advanced pane. That is not a feature anyone completes, and the owner
said so. My regression, my wrong call: I treated "a plugin cannot serve
top-level paths" as a fact about the platform when it was a fact about what had
been built.
Two additions, both manifest-declared, both narrow:
unauthenticatedRootPaths single lowercase segments (`/identity`), served
above the gate. Refused if reserved (`/api`,
`/auth`, `/plugins`, `/dav`, …), refused if another
plugin already claims it, refused if it is anything
more structural than one name.
protocolHeaders hands `/api/*` to the plugin when the request
carries one. Needed because /api is the one
namespace both servers claim — Vaultwarden has
/api/sync, Officer has /api/chat — and the path
cannot tell them apart, so the client says who it
is. ROUTING, not authentication: a forged header
reaches the plugin, which demands its own
credential, and cannot reach anything of Officer's.
The worst it does is cost that caller Officer's API.
The Bun route table gets an entry per claimed segment, built from the plugin
set — `refreshPluginMounts` runs at line ~204, long before serve() at ~378, so
the claims are known. This is the constraint I earlier asserted made the whole
thing impossible, without checking it. The real cost is smaller and stated in
the code: a plugin claiming a root path is not fully installed until
`pm2 restart officer`, because the table is fixed once serve() is called.
Every claim is logged at boot by plugin — a root path answering without a
session should not be something you read a manifest to discover.
13 more tests (30 in the file): reserved segments, malformed segments, two
plugins colliding, and segment-not-substring matching so `/identityx` never
matches `/identity`. Suite 1074 pass / 0 fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`unauthenticatedPaths` has been in PluginManifest since it was designed, with
validation (`publicPathProblem`), a long docstring, and a promise that
`assertPluginPublicPaths` re-checks it at boot. Nothing read the field. No
function by that name existed. Kiosk, the plugin it was written for, declares
none — so it validated, documented itself, and did nothing, and no plugin has
ever actually been served above the gate.
Vault is the first real user: a stock Bitwarden client speaks Vaultwarden's
protocol and has nowhere to put a platform JWT, so it cannot use the
authenticated /api/vault router at all.
── What was missing, and where it had to go ──
Two places, not one, and the second is the one that matters:
• the permission gate skips declared paths — but that gate only runs when a
token WAS presented (`payload && !isOwner && …`), so it is what stops a
valid non-owner reaching something ungranted.
• `protectedRouter.use(userMiddleware)` is what stops an ANONYMOUS request.
A path meant to answer without a session has to skip that too, so it is now
conditional on the same predicate. Fixing only the gate would have left
every declared path returning 401 — passing its own tests and failing in
the one case it exists for.
── Containment ──
Paths resolve against the plugin's own mount (`/api` + mountPrefix + path) and
containment is re-checked there, so a plugin cannot name `/auth` or another
plugin's routes however it edits its manifest. Refusal is per-path: one bad
entry does not take the good ones with it, and each is logged by name.
Matching is on segments rather than characters — `/api/vault/bwx` must not
match `/api/vault/bw/*`, the same class of bug `permissionForApiPath` guards
against with `/user` vs `/username`.
Every plugin with public paths is logged at boot: a route that answers without
a session should not be something you have to read a manifest to discover.
17 tests, pinning the containment rules rather than the happy path. Suite
1061 pass / 0 fail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5