pastilhasandClaude Opus 5
6e9a8ee42f
Follow-up to the /vaultwarden mount: the suffix is superfluous if officer can tell a bitwarden client apart, and it can. Most of vaultwarden surface does not collide at all — /identity, /notifications, /icons and /events belong to it and to nothing here, so those are served at the root by path alone, no sniffing. Only /api collides (vaultwarden has /api/settings/domains, officer has /api/settings), and there the client says who it is: every bitwarden client stamps Bitwarden-Client-Name, older ones Device-Type. Trusting a client header is fine because this is ROUTING, not authentication — the worst a forged one achieves is reaching vaultwarden, which then demands its own credential exactly as it would have. Nothing is authorised by it. Registered before /api so it wins for a bitwarden client, and narrow enough that an ordinary officer request never matches. Verified: /identity reaches the proxy, /api/sync with the header diverts, /api/chat/models without it still answers 401 from officer, and the SPA is untouched. /vaultwarden still works for anything that prefers an explicit path. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>