put the handover instruction where it cannot be missed

Phases 0 and 1 only, phase 2 is a decision, and open /chat first to confirm B1 before trusting the rest.
All of it was already in the document, near the end, which is not where someone handed a file starts
reading.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-10 02:50:32 +01:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 2ebf6dccbb
commit a6ffe3f5a2
+10
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
# OpenCode parity — where it stands, and what to do about it # OpenCode parity — where it stands, and what to do about it
> **If you were handed this to implement: do Phase 0 and Phase 1 only.**
>
> Phase 2 is a decision, not a task — if you reach it, investigate why the serve-based turn path was
> replaced and write the answer down. Do not start building it.
>
> **Before fixing anything, open `/chat` and look for an OpenCode session in the list.** If none appears,
> defect B1 is confirmed and this document was written against the current tree. If one does appear, stop
> and re-check the whole B-list — it came from read-only surveys and only the event-path claim was
> re-verified at source. See "If you are picking this up cold" near the end.
Written 2026-08-10, from three read-only surveys of the Claude sidecar, the OpenCode sidecar, and every Written 2026-08-10, from three read-only surveys of the Claude sidecar, the OpenCode sidecar, and every
officer/frontend branch on harness. Nothing here has been implemented. officer/frontend branch on harness. Nothing here has been implemented.