From a6ffe3f5a2b26e961e2f2cb1c71d4221bc502ed8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andre Padez Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 02:50:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] put the handover instruction where it cannot be missed Phases 0 and 1 only, phase 2 is a decision, and open /chat first to confirm B1 before trusting the rest. All of it was already in the document, near the end, which is not where someone handed a file starts reading. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 --- docs/opencode-parity.md | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/opencode-parity.md b/docs/opencode-parity.md index 1ad0fb83..299caf60 100644 --- a/docs/opencode-parity.md +++ b/docs/opencode-parity.md @@ -1,5 +1,15 @@ # OpenCode parity — where it stands, and what to do about it +> **If you were handed this to implement: do Phase 0 and Phase 1 only.** +> +> Phase 2 is a decision, not a task — if you reach it, investigate why the serve-based turn path was +> replaced and write the answer down. Do not start building it. +> +> **Before fixing anything, open `/chat` and look for an OpenCode session in the list.** If none appears, +> defect B1 is confirmed and this document was written against the current tree. If one does appear, stop +> and re-check the whole B-list — it came from read-only surveys and only the event-path claim was +> re-verified at source. See "If you are picking this up cold" near the end. + Written 2026-08-10, from three read-only surveys of the Claude sidecar, the OpenCode sidecar, and every officer/frontend branch on harness. Nothing here has been implemented.