step 1/4: the permission engine is called permissions, not capabilities

The word meant four different things in this repo, not the three the offscale
doc records:

  1. the permission registry              → RENAMED here
  2. $OFFICER_ROOT/capabilities/ items    → kept; this is what capabilities are
  3. sidecar routing keys                 → step 3, becoming `handles`
  4. Lightning wallet features            → kept; a domain term, and on the wire
                                            to the mobile apps

The fourth was not in the doc and a global find-and-replace would have broken
the mobile wallet, which reads `{ kind, capabilities: Capability[] }` from the
wallet sidecar. So this renamed against an explicit file allowlist rather than
by sweeping the tree, and `CapabilityPage.tsx` — the UI for the item store, and
correctly named already — was left alone.

Moved: servers/capabilities/ → servers/permissions/, capability-gate.ts →
permission-gate.ts, users/capabilities-routes.ts → permissions-routes.ts,
hooks/useCapabilities.ts → usePermissions.ts. Identifiers follow.

Three breaks the typechecker could not see, all found by exercising it live.

The route paths moved with the prose sweep, so the server served
/user/permissions while the frontend still called /user/capabilities. A 404 on
every page load, and tsgo clean throughout.

The response FIELD moved too. `client.get<SelfPermissions>()` is an unchecked
cast, so `data.capabilities` became `undefined` at runtime with no compile
error — `can()` would have answered "no" to everything and the dock would have
emptied itself.

And the grants list was passed straight out of the database, so it arrived as
`{ role, capability, level }` while the screen read `grant.permission`. Every
role would have rendered as holding nothing. It is now mapped in the route:
the wire says `permission`, the column still says `capability`, and step 2
therefore changes nothing any client can see.

The stale react-query keys were the quiet one: two files still invalidated
['self-capabilities'] after the hook moved to ['self-permissions'], so
installing a plugin would have silently stopped refreshing the dock.

The database is untouched — `role_capabilities` and its `capability` column are
step 2, and the two call sites that cross that boundary say so in a comment.
Round-tripped the 9 live grants through the admin endpoint to prove the PUT
contract survived: 9 before, 9 after, Member's three intact.

Also reverted prettier churn on five landing-page files that a broad --write
picked up. Second time today; the lesson is not sticking.

tsgo clean. 797 tests, 787 pass, same 7 pre-existing failures — two of which
now read "path → permission" rather than "path → capability".
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-15 16:03:22 +00:00
parent b0fcd8b81b
commit 2e8ec845c8
59 changed files with 454 additions and 442 deletions
+567
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,567 @@
// The permission registry: the single enumeration of what this platform can do, and the unit the owner
// grants to a role.
//
// ── Why permissions and not routes ──
//
// The obvious model is "list the routes a role may call". It does not survive contact with this codebase.
// A sweep of all 100 mutating platform routes on 2026-08-06 found reads permanently stuck on POST for two
// reasons that are not going away: bodies GET cannot carry (`/stt` multipart audio, `/tts`, `/ocr`,
// `/transcribe`), and credentials that must not sit in a query string where access logs, shell history and
// Referer headers capture them (`/tts/voices` apiKey, the four `/test` endpoints, `/local-providers/probe`).
// Five genuinely free conversions were done in e54d71d; the rest are staying. So the METHOD alone cannot
// carry the read/write distinction — hence `readOnlyWrites` below, declared per permission.
//
// The deeper reason is that a route list is not what the owner is deciding. The owner decides "this person
// gets Gitea". A permission is that decision; the prefixes, sockets and screens it expands to are an
// implementation detail that belongs next to the decision rather than in the granting UI.
//
// ── The four kinds, and why `execution` can never be granted ──
//
// core every authenticated account, always. Not grantable because not deniable — signing in
// without them means a broken app, not a restricted one.
// app the grantable surface. This is what the owner hands out per role.
// confined execution-shaped, but the KERNEL enforces the boundary per account. Grantable, and only
// to an account that has a Linux user — see below.
// execution NEVER grantable. Owner only, structurally.
// admin owner only: the platform administering itself, and the owner's own money and network.
//
// ── `confined`, and why it is not just `app` ──
//
// Added 2026-08-11 with per-user Linux accounts (docs/per-user-linux-accounts.md). A confined permission
// touches the filesystem or runs a process, so calling it an `app` would be a lie — but it is no longer
// the OWNER'S filesystem, because the account has its own Linux user, its own home, and the kernel refusing
// everything above it.
//
// The distinction earns its keep in one place: a grant on a confined permission means NOTHING unless the
// account actually has that Linux user. `authorize.ts` drops confined grants for an account with no
// `osUser`, so "granted but unconfined" resolves to no access rather than to the owner's home. That rule
// lives there, once, instead of in each router that would otherwise have to remember it.
//
// Moving a permission from `execution` to `confined` is therefore a claim with a test attached: every path
// it reaches must resolve its directory from the CALLER, not from HOME_DIR.
//
// `execution` is the important one. Everything under it runs as the OWNER'S OS user in the owner's home
// directory: the terminal is a real shell, chat spawns `claude` with --dangerously-skip-permissions, tasks
// run arbitrary scripts, the file browser and code editor read and write the owner's disk, the desktop is
// the owner's physical screen. Granting any of them is not a feature flag, it is co-ownership of the
// machine. There is no level of "read" that makes a shell safe, which is why these have no level at all.
// Revisit only if per-user home confinement is ever solved — and that is a project, not a checkbox.
//
// ── Read by default ──
//
// A grant carries a level, `read` or `write`. `read` permits safe methods (GET/HEAD/OPTIONS) anywhere in
// the permission, plus mutations under `personal` — sub-paths that hold the CALLER'S own data and nothing
// else. `dashboards` is the worked example: a dashboard belongs to the account that made it, so the whole
// surface is personal and a read grant is really "your own, fully". So "may a member write here" is a
// property of the endpoint, not a policy knob someone has to remember to set.
//
// Music was this note's example until 2026-08-15, when it left with `plugins/music/`. A plugin declares
// the same thing through its manifest's `readOnlyWrites` — `isRequestAllowedAtLevel` merges the two lists,
// so they are one mechanism under two names.
export type PermissionKind = 'core' | 'app' | 'confined' | 'execution' | 'admin';
export type Permission = {
/** Stable identifier. Stored in the database as the grant's subject — renaming one is a data change. */
key: string;
label: string;
description: string;
kind: PermissionKind;
/**
* Path prefixes under `/api`, written exactly as they are mounted on protectedRouter in hono.ts —
* leading slash, no `/api`. The totality check pairs these against the real mount table, so a prefix
* here that nothing mounts is as much an error as a mount nothing claims.
*/
api: string[];
/** WebSocket providers, named as in server.tsx's `handlers` map. */
ws?: string[];
/** Frontend route prefixes. Filters the dock and the app registry; never a security boundary. */
routes?: string[];
/**
* Sub-paths, relative to each `api` prefix, that a READ grant may still mutate because they hold only
* the caller's own data. Matched as a prefix after the permission's own: `/devices` on the `notify`
* permission permits `POST /api/notify/devices/123`.
*/
personal?: string[];
/**
* Reads that must stay POST — see the note at the top. A read grant permits these paths at any method.
* Written relative to the permission's `api` prefix, like `personal`.
*/
readOnlyWrites?: string[];
/**
* Routes any authenticated account may call even holding NO grant on this permission, because they act
* on the caller themselves. `METHOD /exact/path`, relative to the permission's prefix — exact, not a
* prefix, so this cannot widen by accident.
*
* One entry exists and it should stay that way. `PUT /api/users` is self-profile update (useAuth.ts
* calls it to change your own name and avatar) and has always lived on the same router as the owner-only
* account administration beside it. Moving it to `/api/user` would be tidier and would break every
* shipped mobile client, so the honest fix is to say out loud that this one route is not what the
* permission around it is.
*/
selfService?: string[];
};
/**
* The PLATFORM's own permissions. A plugin's are added on top at runtime — see `setPluginPermissions`.
*
* Kept separate from the live `PERMISSIONS` below so two invariants hold by construction rather than by
* anyone remembering them: a plugin can never become `core` (granted to everyone, undeniable), and a
* plugin is never in the fresh-install baseline.
*/
const CORE_REGISTRY: Permission[] = [
// ── core ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
{
key: 'account',
label: 'Account',
description: 'Sign in, your own profile, password, preferences and API keys',
kind: 'core',
// `/api-keys` is core rather than app or admin because a key is not new authority — it is a second way
// to present the authority the account already has, so denying it would only force the holder to keep
// using a password in places a password should not go. What a key can then DO is decided by the same
// permission checks as any other request from that user; nothing here widens them.
api: ['/user', '/dock', '/api-keys'],
routes: ['/settings/profile'],
},
{
key: 'bug-report',
label: 'Report a problem',
description: 'Send the server owner a bug report',
kind: 'core',
api: ['/bug-report'],
},
// ── app: the grantable surface ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
{
key: 'gitea',
label: 'Gitea',
description: 'Repositories, issues, pull requests and notifications from your own Gitea account',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/gitea'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/gitea'],
// Every Gitea call is already scoped to the caller's own personal access token — the sidecar resolves
// the token from the caller's row and the instance from the owner's, so a member holding `read` still
// acts only as themselves upstream. Gitea's own permissions are the second gate and the real one:
// a token cannot reach a repository its account cannot reach, whatever this platform thinks.
//
// Which is why the whole permission is `personal` rather than a list of sub-paths. Nothing under
// /api/gitea can affect another Officer user, so withholding write here would only stop someone
// commenting on their own issues — security theatre with a real cost and no benefit.
personal: ['/'],
},
{
key: 'photos',
label: 'Photos',
description: 'Browse the photo library',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/photos'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/photos'],
},
{
key: 'jellyfin',
label: 'Video',
description: 'Browse and play the Jellyfin library',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/jellyfin'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/jellyfin'],
},
{
key: 'memos',
label: 'Memos',
description: 'Notes',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/memos'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/memos'],
},
{
key: 'calendar',
label: 'Calendar and contacts',
description: 'Calendars, contacts, and the app passwords that sync them to a phone',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/caldav', '/dav'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/calendar', '/contacts'],
// App passwords are minted for and revoked by their own owner; `/dav` holds nothing shared.
personal: ['/'],
},
{
key: 'email',
label: 'Email',
description: 'Mail accounts and messages',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/email'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/email'],
},
{
key: 'notify',
label: 'Notifications',
description: 'Push notifications to your devices',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/notify'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
// Device registration is the caller's own — a phone subscribing to its own push channel.
personal: ['/devices', '/subscriptions'],
},
{
key: 'transmission',
label: 'Transmission',
description: 'Torrent downloads',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/transmission'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/transmission'],
},
{
key: 'soulseek',
label: 'Soulseek',
description: 'Search and download from the Soulseek network',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/slskd'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/soulseek'],
},
{
key: 'invoices',
label: 'Invoices',
description: 'InvoiceShelf books',
kind: 'app',
// api: ['/invoiceshelf'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/invoices'],
},
// `vpn` (POST /api/vpn/enroll) was here until 2026-08-14 — the one member-grantable piece of headscale,
// minting a pre-auth key bound to the caller. Deleted because it had no caller anywhere: the standalone
// OffScale app gates it on `embedded`, which it never sets, and it never will — the app is permanently
// independent of the platform, since the thing that gets you to the platform cannot itself need it.
//
// Device enrolment did not go away, it moved out. A phone claims an invite from the Companion at
// `${invite.base}/api/v1/enroll/claim`, which is a different component entirely and does not involve
// Officer. Confirmed against the mobile monorepo and the companion repo before removal.
//
// What this does cost: `headscale` is `admin`, so with `vpn` gone no member-grantable headscale surface
// remains. Reintroduce one here if members ever need to enrol their own devices through Officer.
// Core, not app — and this was a real defect, not a preference. `/api/dashboards` is not a feature, it is
// the per-user key-value store where EVERY workspace screen keeps its layout (`screens/files`,
// `ws-layout-*`, panel config). `WorkspaceView` renders nothing until that store has loaded, so gating it
// meant a member with `files` granted got a completely blank Files screen and no request to
// /api/file-browser at all — the panel never mounted. Same for Terminal, Chat and every other screen.
//
// It is entirely `personal` and always was: every row is keyed to the caller. There is nothing here to
// withhold, and withholding it does not restrict an account, it breaks it — which is exactly the
// definition of `core` at the top of this file.
{
key: 'dashboards',
label: 'Screen layouts and dashboards',
description: 'Where your own screen layouts and dashboards are saved',
kind: 'core',
api: ['/dashboards'],
routes: ['/dashboards'],
personal: ['/'],
},
// ── execution: never grantable ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// Confined since 2026-08-11. A member's shell is spawned by the pty sidecar through `sudo setpriv` as their
// own Linux account, in their own home, with the platform's environment cleared — so it is their shell, and
// the kernel decides what it can reach. The sidecar also records whose each session is, so `list` and `kill`
// scope to the caller instead of every shell on the box.
//
// What this is NOT is a jail. A member with a shell can `cd /` and read whatever the system leaves
// world-readable, like any account on any machine. It isolates members from each other and from the owner's
// files, which is the promise `confined` makes.
{
key: 'terminal',
label: 'Terminal',
description: 'A shell on this machine, as your own user',
kind: 'confined',
api: ['/terminal'],
ws: ['terminal'],
routes: ['/terminal'],
},
// Confined, and true since 2026-08-12: a member's turn spawns their own `claude` as their own Linux account
// through `sudo setpriv`, with their own `~/.claude` credential, their own transcripts and sessions that
// record whose they are. The two owner-only refusals that held this open — `api/chat/chat.ts` and the socket
// in `server.tsx` — were removed together once each of those was in place.
{
key: 'chat',
label: 'Chat',
description: 'The agent',
kind: 'confined',
// `/agent-status` is on this grant but deliberately NOT on `chatRouter`, because that router refuses
// non-owners wholesale — so an endpoint there could not be read by the accounts that need it. It reports
// two booleans about the caller's own home and nothing about anyone else, which is what lets a member be
// told "run `claude` once to sign in" instead of being shown a tile that 403s.
api: ['/chat', '/agent-status'],
ws: ['chat'],
routes: ['/chat'],
},
// Confined rather than execution since 2026-08-11. Every path under `/file-browser` resolves its root
// through `resolveHomeDir(userId)` in a middleware that refuses the request outright when the account has
// no Linux user — so a member sees their own home and `resolveUserPath`'s containment check stops them
// walking out of it. `/upload` was already per-caller: it writes only under
// `DATA_PATH/<email>/attachments`, never into a home.
{
key: 'files',
label: 'Files',
description: 'Your own home directory on this machine, and the code editor over it',
kind: 'confined',
api: ['/file-browser', '/upload'],
routes: ['/files', '/code-editor'],
},
{
key: 'tasks',
label: 'Tasks and jobs',
description: 'Running permissions, pipelines and background jobs',
kind: 'execution',
api: ['/tasks', '/jobs', '/pipeline-jobs', '/queue'],
ws: ['task-runner', 'pipeline'],
routes: ['/jobs'],
},
{
key: 'items',
label: 'Permission authoring',
description: 'Skills, tools, agents and processes on disk',
kind: 'execution',
api: ['/skills', '/tools', '/agents', '/processes', '/rescan'],
},
{
key: 'desktop',
label: 'Desktop',
description: "The server owner's physical screen",
kind: 'execution',
// api: ['/desktop'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
// ws: ['desktop'],
api: [],
routes: ['/desktop'],
},
// `/browser` — the Chrome-extension relay — is unmounted as of 2026-08-13 and dropped from this claim,
// because check 2 of assertPermissionTotality refuses to boot on a permission claiming a prefix nothing
// serves. Put both back together or neither.
//
// `/scrape` is untouched and is what this permission still covers. It shares nothing with the relay: it
// launches its own headless chromium through playwright and never speaks to the extension.
{
key: 'browser',
label: 'Browser',
description: 'Drives a real browser on the host',
kind: 'execution',
api: ['/scrape'],
routes: ['/browser'],
},
// ── admin: the platform administering itself ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
{
key: 'app-store',
label: 'App store',
description: 'Install, enable and remove the sidecars this server runs',
// Admin, not app. Installing a sidecar starts a process on the machine and provisioning one starts
// containers — that is process control, not a feature a member can be granted a read of. The router
// gates on the owner in its own right as well; this entry is what makes the boot check pass and what
// keeps the surface visible in one enumeration.
kind: 'admin',
api: ['/app-store'],
routes: ['/app-store'],
},
{
key: 'plugins',
label: 'Plugins',
description: 'Install, enable and remove the plugins this server runs',
// Admin for the same reason as the app store above: installing a plugin mounts routes and starts a
// process, which is process control rather than a feature to grant a read of.
//
// Note this permission guards the MANAGEMENT surface, not the plugins themselves. A plugin declares
// its own permissions in its manifest, and those are what gate its routes — so a member can hold
// `offscale` at read without being able to install or remove anything.
kind: 'admin',
api: ['/plugins'],
routes: ['/plugins'],
},
{
key: 'server-admin',
label: 'Server settings',
description: 'Server configuration, integrations and the activity log',
kind: 'admin',
api: ['/server-settings', '/integrations', '/activity', '/system-monitor'],
routes: ['/settings/server', '/settings/system', '/activity', '/system-monitor'],
},
{
key: 'user-admin',
label: 'User management',
description: 'Accounts, roles and what each role may reach',
kind: 'admin',
api: ['/users'],
routes: ['/settings/user-management'],
// Changing your own name, username and avatar. Owner-only account administration is every other route
// on this router and stays owner-only — see ownerGate in users-router.ts, which is the second lock.
selfService: ['PUT /'],
},
// `headscale` lived here until 2026-08-15, when it left with the rest of offscale. A plugin declares
// its own permissions in its manifest and they are registered at install — see plugins/mount.ts. The
// platform no longer knows this permission exists, which is the entire point.
{
key: 'wallet',
label: 'Wallet',
description: "The server owner's bitcoin",
kind: 'admin',
// api: ['/wallet'], // plugin — switched off 2026-08-13
api: [],
routes: ['/wallet'],
},
];
// ── Derived lookups ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
//
// `let`, not `const`, because installing a plugin adds permissions and uninstalling removes them. ESM
// exports are live bindings, so an importer holding `PERMISSION_BY_KEY` sees the reassignment — every
// consumer reads these inside a function, never at module scope, which is what makes that safe.
//
// Nothing mutates the arrays in place. `setPluginPermissions` replaces them, for the same reason
// `buildHonoApp` replaces the app rather than adding routes to it: a half-updated lookup is worse than a
// stale one, and replacement has no half.
/** Core plus every installed plugin's. The list `permissionForApiPath` and the totality check read. */
export let PERMISSIONS: Permission[] = CORE_REGISTRY;
export let PERMISSION_BY_KEY = new Map(PERMISSIONS.map((c) => [c.key, c]));
/**
* The keys an owner may actually hand to a role. `core` is automatic; `execution` and `admin` are owner-only.
*
* `confined` is offered here, but a grant on one is inert for an account without a Linux user — that is
* enforced in `authorize.ts`, not by withholding it from this list. Withholding it would mean the owner
* could not pre-grant a role before provisioning the people in it, which is the normal order of operations.
*/
export let GRANTABLE_PERMISSIONS = PERMISSIONS.filter((c) => c.kind === 'app' || c.kind === 'confined');
/**
* What every role starts with on a fresh install: the three confined permissions, at `write`.
*
* These are the baseline the platform is FOR — a terminal, a file browser and chat. An account that can sign
* in and reach none of them is not a restricted account, it is a useless one, and making the owner grant them
* by hand before anyone can do anything is a step with no decision in it.
*
* Seeded as real rows rather than implied by absence, which keeps the table's one rule intact: a missing row
* means no access, always, with no exceptions to remember. So revoking one of these works exactly like
* revoking anything else — the row goes, and nothing puts it back.
*
* `app` permissions are deliberately NOT here. Those reach data the owner may not intend to share, and each
* needs a sidecar installed before it means anything anyway.
*/
// From CORE_REGISTRY, never from PERMISSIONS: a plugin must not be able to put itself in the baseline
// every new role starts with.
export const DEFAULT_ROLE_PERMISSIONS: string[] = CORE_REGISTRY.filter((c) => c.kind === 'confined').map((c) => c.key);
/**
* Available to every signed-in account without a grant.
*
* From CORE_REGISTRY, so a plugin declaring `kind: 'core'` — which its manifest cannot express, but which
* a future bug could smuggle in — still could not grant itself to everyone undeniably.
*/
export const CORE_CAPABILITIES = CORE_REGISTRY.filter((c) => c.kind === 'core');
/**
* Replace the plugin half of the registry. Called after every install, uninstall, enable and disable.
*
* Plugin permissions are dropped and re-added wholesale rather than diffed: the source of truth is the
* set of installed plugins, and computing a delta against it would be a second answer to the same
* question. A key colliding with a core one is REFUSED here rather than silently overriding — a plugin
* that could redefine `chat` or `terminal` could widen it.
*/
export function setPluginPermissions(pluginPermissions: Permission[]): { rejected: string[] } {
const coreKeys = new Set(CORE_REGISTRY.map((c) => c.key));
const seen = new Set<string>();
const accepted: Permission[] = [];
const rejected: string[] = [];
for (const permission of pluginPermissions) {
if (coreKeys.has(permission.key) || seen.has(permission.key)) {
rejected.push(permission.key);
continue;
}
seen.add(permission.key);
accepted.push(permission);
}
PERMISSIONS = [...CORE_REGISTRY, ...accepted];
PERMISSION_BY_KEY = new Map(PERMISSIONS.map((c) => [c.key, c]));
GRANTABLE_PERMISSIONS = PERMISSIONS.filter((c) => c.kind === 'app' || c.kind === 'confined');
return { rejected };
}
export type PermissionLevel = 'read' | 'write';
const isPrefixOf = (prefix: string, path: string): boolean =>
prefix === '/' || path === prefix || path.startsWith(`${prefix}/`);
/**
* Which permission owns this path? `path` is the full request path (`/api/gitea/...`).
*
* Longest prefix wins, so a permission may claim `/dav` while another claims `/dav/something` without the
* order of the array mattering. Returns null for a path no permission claims — which the totality check
* below is there to make impossible for anything mounted on protectedRouter.
*/
export function permissionForApiPath(path: string): Permission | null {
const rest = path.startsWith('/api') ? path.slice('/api'.length) : path;
let best: Permission | null = null;
let bestLength = -1;
for (const permission of PERMISSIONS) {
for (const prefix of permission.api) {
if (isPrefixOf(prefix, rest) && prefix.length > bestLength) {
best = permission;
bestLength = prefix.length;
}
}
}
return best;
}
export function permissionForWsProvider(provider: string): Permission | null {
return PERMISSIONS.find((c) => c.ws?.includes(provider)) ?? null;
}
/**
* Is this an exact self-service route — one any authenticated account may call without holding the
* permission at all? Matched exactly on method AND path, never as a prefix.
*/
export function isSelfServiceRoute(permission: Permission, method: string, path: string): boolean {
if (!permission.selfService?.length) return false;
const rest = path.startsWith('/api') ? path.slice('/api'.length) : path;
const upper = method.toUpperCase();
return permission.api.some((prefix) => {
if (!isPrefixOf(prefix, rest)) return false;
const sub = rest.slice(prefix.length) || '/';
return permission.selfService!.includes(`${upper} ${sub}`);
});
}
const SAFE_METHODS = new Set(['GET', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS']);
/**
* May a caller holding `level` on `permission` make this request?
*
* `write` is unconditional within the permission. `read` permits safe methods, anything the permission
* declares as a `readOnlyWrites` read-in-POST-clothing, and mutations confined to `personal` sub-paths.
*/
export function isRequestAllowedAtLevel(
permission: Permission,
level: PermissionLevel,
method: string,
path: string,
): boolean {
if (level === 'write') return true;
if (SAFE_METHODS.has(method.toUpperCase())) return true;
const rest = path.startsWith('/api') ? path.slice('/api'.length) : path;
// Strip whichever of the permission's own prefixes matched, so `personal` entries are written relative
// to the permission rather than repeated per prefix.
const withinPermission = permission.api
.filter((prefix) => isPrefixOf(prefix, rest))
.map((prefix) => rest.slice(prefix.length) || '/');
const allowed = [...(permission.personal ?? []), ...(permission.readOnlyWrites ?? [])];
return withinPermission.some((sub) => allowed.some((entry) => isPrefixOf(entry, sub)));
}