This file said there was no way to create a second account. There is, and has
been since 69a31051 — POST /api/users, owner-gated, with a form under Settings.
platform/CLAUDE.md and docs/roles-and-teams.md carried the same stale claim and
were corrected in the platform repo; this one was missed because I said it was
not in a git repository. It is, through the symlink.
Also records roles as a table with foreign keys onto roles.name, USER_ROLES
gone, and UserRole as a plain string guarded at the write path instead of by the
compiler.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
Fourteen while Minesweeper was installed, thirteen once it was removed, with no
platform change either way — a plugin that declares a sidecar writes it into the
generated ecosystem file. Says so now, so the next reader does not treat a
change here as a platform change or expect two machines to agree.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
This file said "NEVER run pm2 yourself — tell the owner the exact command." The
owner granted the opposite on this machine on 2026-08-19, so the document and
the instruction disagreed for a day, and user/CLAUDE.md already flagged it as a
local rule to follow "while it says so".
It now says to run the restart and report it. The scope is unchanged and is the
part that mattered: only the process the change needs, never the whole
ecosystem.config.cjs.
Added the caveat the grant did not remove — check who else is live first. The
owner edits the platform using the platform, several sessions share one
checkout, and a restart is the moment a half-applied change from someone else's
work in progress would ship.
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5