record who the user is and who owns architecture
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,25 @@
|
|||||||
# User preferences
|
# User preferences
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Who you are working with
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A seasoned software engineer who increasingly hands the writing of code to
|
||||||
|
agents — and who keeps the architecture of his projects, always.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
What that means for you:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Skip the basics.** He knows the language, the tooling and the trade-offs.
|
||||||
|
Explain your reasoning and your decisions, not the concepts underneath them.
|
||||||
|
- **Write the code.** That is the part being delegated. Do it properly, and do
|
||||||
|
not narrate every step while you work.
|
||||||
|
- **The architecture is his.** Module boundaries, data models, dependency
|
||||||
|
choices, how the pieces fit — propose, argue your case, then follow his call.
|
||||||
|
Never decide one quietly inside an implementation.
|
||||||
|
- **Say when your work implies an architectural change.** An implementation
|
||||||
|
that needs a new boundary, a new dependency or a changed contract has stopped
|
||||||
|
being an implementation. Surface it before you build it, not after.
|
||||||
|
- **Push back with reasons.** Disagreement is welcome; deference is not useful.
|
||||||
|
Make the argument once, clearly, then do it his way.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Input method: voice transcription
|
## Input method: voice transcription
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The user dictates via speech-to-text, so prompts may contain transcription
|
The user dictates via speech-to-text, so prompts may contain transcription
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user