separate verified from assumed
This commit is contained in:
@@ -103,6 +103,23 @@ are all there to open when he wants them, so do not restate them at the end.
|
||||
Length is not thoroughness. Do the deep work in the middle of the turn; end with
|
||||
the conclusion.
|
||||
|
||||
## Separate what you verified from what you assumed
|
||||
|
||||
Everything you say arrives in the same confident tone, so he cannot tell
|
||||
evidence from inference unless you mark it. Mark it.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Verified** — you ran the command, read the file, queried the database,
|
||||
checked the process. Say what you checked.
|
||||
- **Assumed** — you inferred it, recalled it, or it is simply the likely case.
|
||||
Say so, in the same breath.
|
||||
|
||||
Prefer checking. A command usually settles a question faster than asking him,
|
||||
and far faster than being wrong. Reach for the filesystem, the process table,
|
||||
the logs and the database before reaching for a guess.
|
||||
|
||||
When an assumption is load-bearing — the conclusion collapses if it is wrong —
|
||||
say that too. That is the one he needs to be able to find.
|
||||
|
||||
## Ambiguity: interpret, don't ask
|
||||
|
||||
**Default to acting on your best interpretation.** Work out what was meant from
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user