Option 1 no longer refuses. It assumes offscale is already running — installing
it is one command, documented on the site — and asks for its address and a key,
which is mechanically what option 2 does. The two share a branch because the
difference between them is what to say, not what to do: one is "you already have
a server", the other is "set one up first, here is where".
Option 4 is new: no private network. Presented as a real choice rather than a
failure to choose, with what it costs stated before it is taken and paged so it
is read rather than scrolled past:
· anything reachable remotely has to be published deliberately and kept closed
otherwise
· TLS certificates are yours to obtain and renew
· every exposed service needs its own authentication, since there is no longer
a boundary in front of it
· the machine will be found — anything on a public address is scanned within
minutes
And the one that is specific to this platform rather than general advice:
ALLOW_ANY_ORIGIN defaults ON, which is deliberate and only defensible because
the tailnet is the perimeter. With no tailnet it must be set to false with an
HTTPS proxy in front, or Officer runs with a check disabled on an assumption that
is no longer true. The summary line says so, so it survives the run.
Declining option 4 redraws the menu rather than dropping to a bare prompt.
Tailscale is still installed when 4 is chosen, and the run says how to connect it
later.
Verified all four end to end with tailscale stubbed, plus the decline-and-choose-
again path.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5
c629a849d9