pastilhasandClaude Opus 5
78bf63c209
THIS ONE CHANGES THE DATABASE, and the plan says so with the command that proves
what the change is rather than the claim alone:
command_hq_sessions
+ plugin text null
+ plugin_config jsonb null
both nullable, no default, no constraint — so every existing row is valid the
moment they exist and there is nothing to backfill. no rename, nothing dropped, no
create-then-constrain, and therefore no --force needed or permitted.
THE PLAN DEMANDS A QUERY, NOT AN EXIT CODE. drizzle-kit push can fail and still
exit 0, so step 3 is a verification that must print exactly `plugin plugin_config`
and whose OUTPUT goes in the report per host — not "schema ✓". I ran that exact
command here before asking seven hosts to run it.
NO bun install step: package.json and bun.lock are untouched since .01. that also
sidesteps the step-order bug the last rollout found, where the standard
plugins:update runs before a plan's install and imports a package that is not there
yet.
the backup step reads the env variable name rather than assuming it. several hosts
use OFFICERDEV_POSTGRES_URL and not POSTGRES_URL, which is the kind of detail that
turns a backup step into a file containing an error message.
av-club's commander template reaches each host through the standard plugins:update
step rather than through this plan — worth saying, because av-club moving is
expected here rather than a surprise.
gate before tagging: typecheck clean, docs:check green, locale parity green. the
ModelSelector test still fails and is still not mine — same chat code, untouched by
this range.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043
deploy/
One file per release, and one report per release.
deploy/
├── 2026.08.21.01.md the plan — what to run, in order, on which hosts
└── 2026.08.21.01.report.md what actually happened, written by the commander
The plan is written by hand before the release commit. The report is written by the deploy commander afterwards and pushed back here.
A release is a tag, deploy/<version>, and nothing else triggers a deploy — not a commit message,
not a branch. A tag cannot be written into prose by accident, which a code word can and which every
document about deploying does.
What marks a release deployed is LOCAL: $OFFICER_ROOT/data/deploys/<version>.done. Not the report.
If the lock were the pushed report, a failed push would mean the release looked undeployed and the next
tick would roll it out again — and pushes here fail for unrelated reasons. So the report is an artefact,
valuable and not load-bearing.
See prompts/deploy-commander.md.