Files
platform/COMMS/command-hq
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 56911f6874 COMMS: the self-re-arm evidence is stronger than either write-up said
Andre's own count: at least 10-15 runs, before and after the current mechanism
existed, zero failures. Both notes had it as "hours, this session".

Recorded as a correction because it is a different class of claim. "It worked for
hours tonight" supports a decision; "it has never failed across a dozen runs and two
surrounding mechanisms" supports not revisiting it — which matters, because
self-re-arm looks fragile on paper and the instinct of anyone reading it cold is to
add a safety net the evidence says is unnecessary.

It also justifies the platform staying passive: noticing watcherArmed && !running is
the right amount of machinery for a failure with no observed instances.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 09:40:18 +01:00
..