Files
platform/scripts
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 2e70a6dd21 ask before replacing a config the user already has, and show the difference
Keeping theirs silently was safe but unhelpful: they never learn a newer version
exists, and the only hint was a cp command printed in a warning. Now it asks.

  [1] keep yours — nothing changes
  [2] use ours — yours is kept as <file>.before-machine-setup
  [3] show me the difference first

The diff is labelled "yours" and "ours" rather than by path, so - is what you
would lose and + is what you would gain, and it goes through the pager because a
config diff is routinely longer than a screen. Choosing to replace always keeps
the old file beside the new one; nothing is destroyed.

An unattended run — ASSUME_YES, or no terminal on stdin — keeps theirs and says
so. "Yes to everything" cannot sensibly mean "overwrite configuration nobody was
present to defend", so this is the one prompt ASSUME_YES answers conservatively
rather than affirmatively.

Applies to every file that goes through install_config, which is .tmux.conf and
starship.toml today and is where any other dotfile should go.

On the starship question: there is one file now, scripts/setup/starship.toml, and
the inline copy is gone. Owner and members get the same prompt, which is what
os-user-shell.ts always claimed.

Verified through a pty, since the -t 0 guard correctly makes the interactive path
untestable over a pipe: the diff renders, replacing writes the backup, and the
live file ends up byte-identical to ours.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 20:48:08 +00:00
..
2026-02-16 19:34:35 +00:00