# Push notifications — design **Status (2026-08-19):** the server side is **built and core**. The app side is **not started**, and the handoff document this file promised was never written. - **Server: done and live.** `officer-notify` runs as a core PM2 process, `/api/notify` is mounted and permission-gated, and `push_devices` is in the schema. Steps 1–4 of the build order below are complete; step 5 (a first producer) is not. - **Switched off and back on.** On 2026-08-13 this was slated to become a plugin alongside memos and photos. Those two were extracted; this never was, so it spent six days mounted nowhere with its schema commented out. Restored to core on 2026-08-19 — core rather than a plugin because the producers are the platform's own (the queue, an agent turn ending, mail arriving), and a notifier the owner can uninstall is one those producers cannot rely on. - **App side: nothing.** `officer-suite` does not exist; the apps repo is `officerdev/monorepo-mobile`. It has no `COMMS/` directory, no `PUSH_NOTIFICATIONS_APP.md`, no APNs/FCM token handling and no call to the device-registration endpoint. `apps/chat` ships a config plugin that deliberately STRIPS the iOS push entitlement (it uses local notifications only), so today's iOS build cannot receive a remote push at all. The only app-side note, `apps/mobile/PUSH_NOTIFICATIONS.md` (2026-07-24), predates this design and CONTRADICTS it — it rejects FCM outright because the Pixel runs GrapheneOS without Play Services. **That contradiction is unresolved and is the first thing to settle**, because it decides Android. ## What was decided, and what was rejected **Apple and Google are unavoidable and we accept them.** There is no direct server→phone push on either platform: iOS suspends apps, so only APNs can wake one, and Android only accepts pushes from FCM. An earlier plan had these the other way round — believing iOS could be pushed to directly and Android needed a bridge. It is the reverse. **Expo is rejected.** Its push service is a relay in front of APNs and FCM, and it does not remove either credential — a standalone Android build still needs an FCM service account, which you would upload _to Expo_. All it adds is fan-out convenience, in exchange for our payloads and our APNs key living on a fourth party's servers. We talk to Apple and Google ourselves. **The Android foreground-service alternative is rejected for now.** A persistent socket plus a local notification genuinely avoids Google, and the tailnet makes the connection easy. It costs a permanent "Officer is running" entry in the notification shade and is unreliable against OEM battery managers (Samsung, Xiaomi). Recorded here because it remains the fallback if FCM ever becomes unacceptable. ## Payload policy — the notification is a doorbell, not a message **This is the load-bearing decision, and it is not optional.** Both services see metadata regardless: which device, how often, at what times. What they must not see is content. So a push carries a category and an id, never the substance: ``` ✅ { type: 'mail', count: 3 } ❌ { title: 'Re: invoice', from: 'x@y.com' } ✅ { type: 'job', id: 412, ok: false } ❌ { error: 'ENOENT /home/pastilhas/…' } ``` The app already has a tailnet connection. On tap it fetches the real content itself. The visible text is generic ("3 new emails"), assembled on the device from the category, not sent through Apple or Google. Cost of both services: **free**. No per-message charge on either. ## Where it lives A new **`officer-notify` sidecar**, PM2 peer, its own loopback HTTP listener, announced as `notify:server` and proxied at `/api/notify` by `createSidecarProxy`. Not the platform, because the producers are spread out — the queue, the email sidecar, the agent sidecar — and a platform-owned notifier would force every sidecar to call _back_ into the platform. That is the inversion just removed from email. As a sidecar, anything POSTs to it over loopback. It also absorbs `src/servers/notify/discord.ts`, so there is one outbound-notification surface with channels behind it rather than a Discord path and a push path that do not know about each other. ``` producer (queue / email / agent / platform) │ POST /_officer/notify { type, ... } ▼ officer-notify ─┬─ apns → api.push.apple.com (HTTP/2, ES256 JWT) ├─ fcm → fcm.googleapis.com/v1 (OAuth2 bearer) └─ discord→ webhook (existing) ``` ## Credentials Env only, on the sidecar, never in the platform process and never in the database. | var | what | | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | | `APNS_KEY_P8` | contents of the `.p8` auth key (PKCS#8 EC P-256) | | `APNS_KEY_ID` | the key's 10-char Key ID | | `APNS_TEAM_ID` | Apple Developer Team ID | | `FCM_SERVICE_ACCOUNT` | the service-account JSON | | `DISCORD_WEBHOOK_URL` | existing, moves here | The `.p8` does not expire and can push to your apps forever. Treat it as spending-grade. `APNS_ENV` was in this table and is **not** implemented, deliberately: the host is chosen per device from the `environment` column, not per process, so one server can push to a TestFlight build and a release build at the same time. All three read `OFFICERDEV_ ?? `, the house env convention. ## Both protocols, verified in Bun before designing around them - **APNs**: HTTP/2 only. `node:http2` works in Bun 1.3.10 (checked against a live server). Auth is an ES256 JWT signed with the `.p8`, valid ≤1h, refreshed no more often than every 20 min or Apple rejects it. **The signature must be raw `r||s` (64 bytes)** — `createSign(...).sign({ key, dsaEncoding: 'ieee-p1363' })`. Node's default DER encoding is silently rejected. - **FCM v1**: ordinary HTTPS. Sign an RS256 JWT with the service-account key, exchange it at `oauth2.googleapis.com/token` for a 1-hour access token, cache that, then POST to `fcm.googleapis.com/v1/projects//messages:send`. No push library is needed for either — `node:crypto` and `node:http2` cover it. All three endpoints are reachable from this host. ## Device registry New table `push_devices`: | column | note | | --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `id` | serial | | `user_id` | fk users | | `token` | the native token — APNs device token or FCM registration token | | `platform` | `ios` \| `android` | | `environment` | `production` \| `sandbox` — an iOS dev-build token fails against prod with a silent `BadDeviceToken` | | `bundle_id` | `apns-topic`; also distinguishes the three apps | | `app_slug` | `mobile` \| `music` \| `read-aloud` | | `last_seen_at`, `failure_count`, `created_at` | pruning | Unique on `(token, bundle_id)`. Registration is idempotent: the app re-registers on every launch, since tokens rotate. ## Failure handling — the part that is usually skipped **APNs** answers inline: `410 Unregistered` or `400 BadDeviceToken` means delete the row immediately. **FCM** answers inline too: `UNREGISTERED` / `INVALID_ARGUMENT` means delete. Everything else increments `failure_count`; three strikes and the row goes. Without this the registry fills with dead tokens and delivery quietly degrades. (If Expo were used, this would instead require a deferred receipt poll ~15 min after send. Going direct removes that entire mechanism — a genuine simplification, worth noting against the fan-out we gave up.) ## Open, deliberately deferred - **Which events notify.** Out of scope by instruction: build the pipe first. Candidates when we get there: job finished, new mail, long agent turn done, download complete. - **Quiet hours and batching.** New mail on an 18k-mail account is unusable at one push per message. - **`apps/mobile` EAS/bundle id** — only `apps/music` is confirmed to have one (`dev.officer.music`). ## Build order 1. ~~`push_devices` table + `bun db:push`.~~ done 2. ~~`officer-notify` sidecar shell: listener, PM2 entry, `/api/notify` proxy, Discord channel moved in.~~ done 3. ~~APNs channel + `POST /_officer/devices` registration.~~ done (27 tests) 4. ~~FCM channel.~~ done (27 tests) 5. First producer wired. **← next, and nothing has been notified by anything yet.** Ahead of 5, two things are unresolved and neither is code: the Android/GrapheneOS contradiction above, and whether a member can register a device (the `notify` permission is `kind: 'app'`, so it is grantable per role and denied by default — a member with no grant cannot subscribe their own phone).