Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 cbfe376a42 accept the repo URL as an argument
bun setup -- --repo https://github.com/you/platform.git

The default is a private Gitea over SSH, which only authenticates on a machine
whose key it already knows — so a genuinely fresh server could not clone at all
without editing lib/repo.sh or knowing OFFICER_REPO existed.

Added to both entry points. install.sh exports it rather than forwarding an
argument it does not own; officer-setup.sh sets it before lib/repo.sh is sourced,
which reads `${OFFICER_REPO:-<default>}`, so an absent flag still defaults.

Two bugs found doing it, both pre-existing:

  - officer-setup.sh ALREADY had an arg parser, at the top, before the sources. My
    first attempt added a second one further down that was unreachable — every
    argument had already been consumed and `*)` would have exited 2 on --repo.
    Caught because `--help` printed the wrong usage.

  - both scripts re-execute through sudo passing `"$@"`, which the parse loop had
    already emptied with `shift`. So `officer-setup.sh --only build` run as a
    normal user silently became a FULL run the moment it escalated, and
    `install.sh --officer-only` re-ran the machine half. Nothing said so; the flag
    just stopped existing. ORIGINAL_ARGS is captured before the loop now.

`${ORIGINAL_ARGS[@]+"${ORIGINAL_ARGS[@]}"}` is the set -u safe form — expanding an
empty array is an error on bash before 4.4, and this runs on whatever the machine
came with.

Verified: bash -n on both, --help/--list/--repo/--repo=/unknown-option on both, the
set -e behaviour of the guarded export, and that args survive the shift loop.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 05:54:56 +00:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 77f1284925 install report: first cut, generated by the helpers
Every run writes a timestamped install-report.md recording what was installed,
changed, kept, skipped, started and run as root. Written for an adversarial read:
the person who just ran a setup script off the internet hands it to an agent of
their choosing and asks whether it did anything it should not have.

Recorded by the HELPERS rather than by the sections. pkg_install and
install_config report themselves, so anything installed or written through them
appears whether or not a section author remembered — a section that has to
remember is a section that will forget, and an incomplete report is worse than
none because it reads as a full account.

"Kept" is recorded as carefully as "changed". Leaving somebody's .zshrc alone is
the claim a reviewer most wants substantiated, and it is invisible unless stated.

Secrets are redacted at the moment of recording rather than filtered at render,
so a credential never sits in memory formatted for printing. Verified against a
POSTGRES_URL and an api_key/password pair.

REPORT_FILE is passed through the sudo re-exec. It was not, first time, and the
report silently vanished — the third variable this evening lost to env_reset.

Unfinished on purpose, paused mid-task at the owner's request: machine-setup's 26
sections still only report through the two shared helpers, so the sections that
change system state directly — systemd units, netplan, ufw, sshd drop-ins — are
not yet recorded. That is the half a reviewer would care most about.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-13 03:33:48 +00:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 ea87ffed04 ask for privileges, do not demand them
Run any of the three as yourself. On Linux they now ask through sudo and
re-execute, rather than refusing until you type it. Typing `sudo` still works and
changes nothing — it just stops being the price of starting.

This also fixes a trap that had nothing to do with taste. `sudo` strips the
environment by default (`env_reset`), so `OFFICER_ROOT=/somewhere sudo ./install.sh`
silently loses the variable and installs to the default path instead. The
re-exec passes OFFICER_ROOT, SETUP_USERNAME and MACHINE_ROLE to sudo BY NAME
rather than relying on -E, which env_reset ignores. This project has already lost
a variable to that once — see the DATA_PATH commit.

The invoking account is recovered the way it always was: sudo sets SUDO_USER,
which lib/base.sh already reads, including the check for a SUDO_USER that is
itself uid 0 on providers whose default account is root under an ordinary name.

macOS never escalates, in any of the three. Homebrew refuses to run as root, the
account running the script IS the owner, and the sections that needed root are
the ones the macOS path skips.

--help and argument errors still work with no privileges at all, since arguments
are parsed before any of this.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-13 02:54:10 +00:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 3cca07187e scripts/install.sh — one command for both halves
`bun setup` runs it. Machine setup first, then officer setup, stopping if the
first does not finish rather than running the second against a machine that is
not ready.

They stay two scripts because they answer two different questions and are worth
running apart — a machine you already trust needs only the second, one you are
rebuilding needs only the first. --machine-only and --officer-only say so
directly, and both halves remain runnable by path.

Privileges are checked here, before anything is done, because the two systems
want opposite things: Linux needs root for apt, systemd, useradd, netplan and ufw
and for creating directories owned by the service account; macOS must NOT be
root, since Homebrew refuses to run as one. Each script already enforces its own
rule, so this is only about failing early instead of halfway.

officer-setup.sh gained the same OS-aware check. It required root unconditionally,
which on macOS would have failed immediately after machine-setup — which must run
as the user — and for no reason: there the account running it IS the owner, so
there is nothing to chown and nothing to drop privileges to.

Arguments are parsed before privileges, so --help works without sudo and an
unknown option is rejected before anybody is asked for a password. It did not,
first time round.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-13 02:49:44 +00:00