the owner confirmed it live the same day. what that leaves untested is the
half the cache exists for — a second login, the tabs, a stored row surviving
a switch — so the docs now say which half is proven instead of claiming
neither is.
also records the bug the first deploy found, since the doc had asserted the
degradation that turned out to be broken.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
it has never run: db:push has not been applied and neither process has been
restarted. docs/ai-usage-panel.md records where every number comes from and
why officer cannot derive any of them itself, the two things the live
payload settled (every model-scoped bucket is null while limits[] carries a
real fable window; the window is named by kind, never by the model name),
the measured costs, and the staleness rules — which are the part most likely
to be wrong, because they assert things about data they did not measure.
sixteen ordered tests in five groups. group C is the actual feature. test 10
is the one that would break silently: a refresh must not overwrite an
account it could not measure.
also records what the scan measurement found, since it decides the deferred
work — 74.7% of message ids appear in more than one transcript file, so
per-file aggregates cannot be summed and an incremental scan is not the
one-liner it looks like.
TODO.md gains an entry under "waiting on the owner to run it", beside plan
mode, which is also still unexercised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5