role CRUD, with a guard the spec did not ask for

Phase 2 part 3 of docs/roles-and-teams.md. Create, rename and delete, each
returning a discriminated result rather than throwing, so a router can say which
rule refused and why instead of parsing an error string. Written by a Sonnet
subagent against the plan; reviewed, exercised against the live database, and
amended here.

The amendment is the reason a review was worth doing. renameRole changes
roles.name, and there is no foreign key yet — part 2 ships ON UPDATE CASCADE as
its own release — so a rename would leave every holder pointing at a name that no
longer exists. It is unreachable today only by accident: manage-users.ts validates
against the USER_ROLES union, so a runtime-created role cannot be assigned and a
non-system role has no holders. That evaporates the moment part 4 makes UserRole a
plain string, and parts 2 and 4 could land in either order.

So rename now refuses while anybody holds it, sharing one holder-count definition
with delete so the two cannot disagree about what "in use" means. It comes out when
the cascade lands, and then the cascade does the job properly by moving holders
rather than refusing.

Adding that reason made the router's switch non-exhaustive, which the typechecker
caught — the discriminated-result shape earning its keep on its first change.

System roles refuse both rename and delete: the platform's own code names them by
string, so renaming one is a code change that has not happened. Delete never
reassigns holders to a fallback, because that is a permission change nobody asked
for.

Exercised end to end: duplicate, empty name, system rename, system delete, a real
rename, a rename onto an existing name, delete, and delete of something absent.
The four seeded roles survive with the owner counted against Super Admin.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Officer-Session: 656f5c85-e49a-4f1f-b9f3-042a04b4d043

CLAUDE.md

@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ ahead of everything, and it re-verifies the token itself so it covers routes tha
 - `permissions/registry.ts` — the single enumeration of what the platform can do, in five kinds:
   `core` (every account, not deniable), `app` (**the grantable surface**), `confined` (grantable, but
   only to an account that has a Linux user), `execution` and `admin` (owner only, and `execution` is
-  never grantable at any level). **21 entries as of 2026-08-23** — verified by `bun run docs:check`, which fails if this number drifts again: 5 core, 4 app, 4 confined, 4 execution, 4 admin. It said 27 for nine days.
+  never grantable at any level). **22 entries as of 2026-08-23** — verified by `bun run docs:check`, which fails if this number drifts again: 5 core, 4 app, 4 confined, 4 execution, 5 admin. It said 27 for nine days.
 - `permissions/authorize.ts` — resolves "may this account do this". Owner short-circuits first; every
   other answer is role grants plus core, with `execution`/`admin` stripped even if a row grants them,
   and `confined` stripped for an account with no `osUser`.