Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 a331b85dc3 a host that predates HTTP/2 can be repaired
`http2_support: true` is the default now and is set when a host is secured, but both hosts here were
created and secured before either change, so nothing re-runs and they stay on HTTP/1.1 forever.
Lighthouse costs that 670 ms.

An explicit action rather than a fix applied on load: a panel that silently rewrites the proxy while
somebody is reading it is not a thing to build, and the change reloads nginx for every site behind it.

Only offered where it can do something — a host with a certificate that lacks it. HTTP/2 is negotiated
during the TLS handshake, so on a plain host the field is stored and never used, and the button would
do nothing visible. A host created since the default never shows it: this is a repair, not a setting.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 22:19:31 +01:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 9b64933797 proxy hosts get HTTP/2
Created with `http2_support: false`, so the live site runs HTTP/1.1 — six connections and everything
else queued behind them. Lighthouse costs it 900 ms, most of it the gallery images waiting on each
other.

Set in the defaults and again in `attach`, because HTTP/2 only means anything once there is a
certificate. A host created before this — both of them here — is secured but still on 1.1, and the
attach path is the one that can fix it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 22:12:43 +01:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 27f93d6e14 production is a static build behind nginx, not a process
The site's own build script says it outright: "The public site is not served by
Bun in production — it is a directory of files behind nginx. Output: dist/."
So production has no port, nothing to restart, and nothing that can crash at
three in the morning. It is built or stale, and served or not served.

Showing it as a pm2 process was showing something that does not exist, and its
Start button could only ever have failed. It now has Build, Serve and Stop, and
the two states are reported separately — a build can succeed while nothing
serves it, and a container can serve a directory built weeks ago. They fail
independently and are fixed differently.

The container exists because nginx could not see the files. NPM mounts only its
own /data and /etc/letsencrypt, and there is no other nginx on the box. The
alternatives were putting site files inside NPM's own volume, or editing NPM's
compose and restarting it — which takes every site on this machine down for a
moment. So: one nginx:alpine, dist mounted READ-ONLY, on NPM's own network with
NO published port. NPM reaches it by name, and nothing about the site is exposed
except through the proxy.

Recreated rather than restarted, for the same reason pm2 is: a container keeps
the mounts it was created with, so a root location changed here would be saved,
displayed, and still serving the old directory.

Domains follows. Production's forward target is a container NAME, not the docker
gateway that reaches a host process — and matching what already points at it
uses the full target rather than the port, since every other site behind this
NPM on port 80 would otherwise be listed as fofos's.

The compiler found the dead branches this left in startServer once production
could no longer reach it. Removed rather than left to read as though the case
were still possible.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 19:36:29 +01:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 0a95647b8e once a server has a domain, stop asking for another
A form offering work nobody came to do. Both servers were pointed at, both had
certificates, and the block still showed two empty fields and two buttons — the
second address for one site is the rare case, and it lives in Proxy Manager with
the rest of the picture.

So the field appears only while that server has nothing, and the forward address
goes with them: once both are pointed somewhere it configures nothing.

`min-w-0` on the input, because a flex child refuses to shrink below its content
by default, which is what was pushing "Point here" off the edge of the card.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 14:12:17 +01:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 3e07ee38c2 a certificate request outlives the browser, so stop treating a timeout as failure
Issuing waits for a DNS record to propagate — two minutes before certbot even
looks — and the proxy in front of Officer gives up at sixty seconds with a 504
while certbot carries on and succeeds. So the only thing anybody sees is a
timeout, and underneath it the certificate exists and is attached to nothing.
That is exactly what happened: npm-7 was issued for
dev.fofosfluffybastards.com and the host still had ssl:0, because the request
died between issuing and attaching.

So a timeout is no longer a failure. The request is fired, and afterwards —
returned, failed or cut off — this asks what certificates exist and attaches the
one covering these names, polling for up to five minutes.

And it looks for an existing certificate BEFORE asking for anything. A retry
would otherwise spend a Let's Encrypt rate limit to obtain a duplicate of one
already on the disk, and those limits are per-week: getting it wrong means not
being able to fix it today. It also means the stuck host above is repaired by
pressing the same button.

Matching requires the certificate to cover EVERY name the host serves. One that
covers a single domain of two is not this host's certificate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 14:07:13 +01:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 26b3ef2ce4 certificates go over the DNS challenge, using the key Officer already holds
The HTTP challenge proves a domain by being visited on port 80, which requires
the name to already resolve to this machine — which is exactly what is not true
at the moment somebody is setting one up. certbot then fails with "Some
challenges have failed" and a 500 that says nothing about why.

The DNS challenge has no such requirement: it proves ownership by writing a
record. That needs the registrar's API key, and this must not go looking for
one — Officer stores DNS provider keys encrypted and never returns them, to
anybody. /domains/certificate exists for precisely this: it works out which
provider owns the name from the Domains list, decrypts the key itself, and hands
back NPM's answer. The key is used and never seen.

Its refusals are translated rather than shown raw. "Not in the domain list" is a
true sentence that tells nobody what to do; which list, and who can add to it,
is the part that matters.

And the button says it is issuing, because a DNS record has to propagate before
Let's Encrypt will look for it — the wait is minutes, and a spinner sitting for
three of them with no explanation is indistinguishable from one that has hung.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 14:02:36 +01:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 a064a3d0d6 a Domains block, pointing NPM at the two servers
It talks to the proxy-manager PLUGIN, from the browser, with the user's own
session. Not to NPM, and not from this plugin's server: NPM's credential belongs
to proxy-manager and its skill is explicit that the pass-through route is the
sanctioned path. Calling it this way means this plugin never holds that
credential, and two plugins do not acquire a server-to-server dependency that
each would then have to know the installed state of.

forward_host is copied from what already works here. NPM runs in a container, so
127.0.0.1 there is NPM itself rather than this machine — a host pointed at it
resolves, serves nothing, and looks exactly like the site being down. The
correct value is the Docker gateway, which is a fact about this machine's
networking that neither this plugin nor a person should have to know. So the
default is taken by majority from the hosts NPM already serves, since those are
by construction addresses that work. It is shown in an editable field, because a
guess made from other people's configuration should be visible before it is used.

Creating is offered and deleting is not. A new host is additive and reversible;
removing or repointing one is a live domain changing where it goes, and this
panel would be offering that with a fraction of the context the Proxy Manager
screen has.

Certificates are two calls, because NPM issues one as its own object and a host
merely references it. The body is exactly {provider, domain_names} —
letsencrypt_email and letsencrypt_agree are what every tutorial shows and NPM
2.15 rejects the request for including them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 13:58:50 +01:00