3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 27f93d6e14 production is a static build behind nginx, not a process
The site's own build script says it outright: "The public site is not served by
Bun in production — it is a directory of files behind nginx. Output: dist/."
So production has no port, nothing to restart, and nothing that can crash at
three in the morning. It is built or stale, and served or not served.

Showing it as a pm2 process was showing something that does not exist, and its
Start button could only ever have failed. It now has Build, Serve and Stop, and
the two states are reported separately — a build can succeed while nothing
serves it, and a container can serve a directory built weeks ago. They fail
independently and are fixed differently.

The container exists because nginx could not see the files. NPM mounts only its
own /data and /etc/letsencrypt, and there is no other nginx on the box. The
alternatives were putting site files inside NPM's own volume, or editing NPM's
compose and restarting it — which takes every site on this machine down for a
moment. So: one nginx:alpine, dist mounted READ-ONLY, on NPM's own network with
NO published port. NPM reaches it by name, and nothing about the site is exposed
except through the proxy.

Recreated rather than restarted, for the same reason pm2 is: a container keeps
the mounts it was created with, so a root location changed here would be saved,
displayed, and still serving the old directory.

Domains follows. Production's forward target is a container NAME, not the docker
gateway that reaches a host process — and matching what already points at it
uses the full target rather than the port, since every other site behind this
NPM on port 80 would otherwise be listed as fofos's.

The compiler found the dead branches this left in startServer once production
could no longer reach it. Removed rather than left to read as though the case
were still possible.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 19:36:29 +01:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 a064a3d0d6 a Domains block, pointing NPM at the two servers
It talks to the proxy-manager PLUGIN, from the browser, with the user's own
session. Not to NPM, and not from this plugin's server: NPM's credential belongs
to proxy-manager and its skill is explicit that the pass-through route is the
sanctioned path. Calling it this way means this plugin never holds that
credential, and two plugins do not acquire a server-to-server dependency that
each would then have to know the installed state of.

forward_host is copied from what already works here. NPM runs in a container, so
127.0.0.1 there is NPM itself rather than this machine — a host pointed at it
resolves, serves nothing, and looks exactly like the site being down. The
correct value is the Docker gateway, which is a fact about this machine's
networking that neither this plugin nor a person should have to know. So the
default is taken by majority from the hosts NPM already serves, since those are
by construction addresses that work. It is shown in an editable field, because a
guess made from other people's configuration should be visible before it is used.

Creating is offered and deleting is not. A new host is additive and reversible;
removing or repointing one is a live domain changing where it goes, and this
panel would be offering that with a fraction of the context the Proxy Manager
screen has.

Certificates are two calls, because NPM issues one as its own object and a host
merely references it. The body is exactly {provider, domain_names} —
letsencrypt_email and letsencrypt_agree are what every tutorial shows and NPM
2.15 rejects the request for including them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 13:58:50 +01:00
pastilhasandClaude Opus 5 b27969ba57 Servers is a block in Administration, not a section of its own
It is the same KIND of thing as the root location and the databases — this
machine, not the site's content — and a nav row leading to one card was a whole
screen to reach three lines.

Last of the three, because it needs both of the others: a server has nowhere to
run without the checkout and nothing to read without a database.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 13:53:39 +01:00